Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28799237›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2017

Anticancer efficacy of the hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide is enhanced in combination with proapoptotic receptor agonists against osteosarcoma.

Vasilios Liapis, Aneta Zysk, Mark DeNichilo, Irene Zinonos, Shelley Hay, Vasilios Panagopoulos, Alexandra Shoubridge, Christopher Difelice, Vladimir Ponomarev, Wendy Ingman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Lentinan up-regulates microRNA-340 to promote apoptosis and autophagy of human osteosarcoma cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasilios LiapisDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Aneta ZyskDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Mark DeNichiloVascular Biology and Cell Trafficking Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Irene ZinonosDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Shelley HayDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Vasilios PanagopoulosDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Alexandra ShoubridgeDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Christopher DifeliceDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Vladimir PonomarevDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wendy IngmanDiscipline of Surgery, School of Medicine at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, Australia.
Gerald J AtkinsDiscipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
David M FindlayDiscipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrew C W ZannettinoSchool of Medical Sciences, Myeloma Research Laboratory Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Andreas EvdokiouDiscipline of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8321-9806
Basil Hetzel Institute · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor hypoxia is a major cause of treatment failure for a variety of malignancies. However, hypoxia also leads to treatment opportunities as demonstrated by the development of compounds that target regions of hypoxia within tumors. Evofosfamide is a hypoxia-activated prodrug that is created by linking the hypoxia-seeking 2-nitroimidazole moiety to the cytotoxic bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM). When evofosfamide is delivered to hypoxic regions of tumors, the DNA cross-linking toxin, Br-IPM, is released leading to cell death. This study assessed the anticancer efficacy of evofosfamide in combination with the Proapoptotic Receptor Agonists (PARAs) dulanermin and drozitumab against human osteosarcoma in vitro and in an intratibial murine model of osteosarcoma. Under hypoxic conditions in vitro, evofosfamide cooperated with dulanermin and drozitumab, resulting in the potentiation of cytotoxicity to osteosarcoma cells. In contrast, under the same conditions, primary human osteoblasts were resistant to treatment. Animals transplanted with osteosarcoma cells directly into their tibiae developed mixed osteosclerotic/osteolytic bone lesions and consequently developed lung metastases 3 weeks post cancer cell transplantation. Tumor burden in the bone was reduced by evofosfamide treatment alone and in combination with drozitumab and prevented osteosarcoma-induced bone destruction while also reducing the growth of pulmonary metastases. These results suggest that evofosfamide may be an attractive therapeutic agent, with strong anticancer activity alone or in combination with either drozitumab or dulanermin against osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone NeoplasmsCell HypoxiaCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDrug SynergismHumansNitroimidazolesOsteosarcomaPhosphoramide MustardsProdrugsTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddrozitumabNitroimidazolesPhosphoramide MustardsProdrugsTH 302TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTNFSF10 protein, humanDrozitumabdulanerminevofosfamidehypoxiaosteosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID28799237
PMCPMC5603834
OpenAlexW2743887038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.