Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28799214›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2017

Refill adherence and persistence to lipid-lowering medicines in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nation-wide register-based study.

Sofia Axia Karlsson, Christel Hero, Björn Eliasson, Stefan Franzén, Ann-Marie Svensson, Mervete Miftaraj, Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir, Katarina Eeg-Olofsson, Karolina Andersson Sundell

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of Socioeconomic Factors and Gender on Refill Adherence and Persistence to Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sofia Axia KarlssonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1896-9587
Christel HeroDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Björn EliassonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stefan FranzénNational Diabetes Register, Centre of Registers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ann-Marie SvenssonNational Diabetes Register, Centre of Registers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mervete MiftarajNational Diabetes Register, Centre of Registers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Soffia GudbjörnsdottirDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Katarina Eeg-OlofssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karolina Andersson SundellDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to describe and compare refill adherence and persistence to lipid-lowering medicines in patients with type 2 diabetes by previous cardiovascular disease (CVD).

methodsWe followed 97 595 patients (58% men; 23% with previous CVD) who were 18 years of age or older when initiating lipid-lowering medicines in 2007-2010 until first fill of multi-dose dispensed medicines, death, or 3 years. Using personal identity numbers, we linked individuals' data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, the Swedish National Diabetes Register, the National Patient Register, the Cause of Death Register, and the Longitudinal Integration Database for Health Insurance and Labour Market Studies. We assessed refill adherence using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and the maximum gap method, and measured persistence from initiation to discontinuation of treatment or until 3 years after initiation. We analyzed differences in refill adherence and persistence by previous CVD in multiple regression models, adjusted for socioeconomic status, concurrent medicines, and clinical characteristics.

resultsThe mean age of the study population was 64 years, 80% were born in Sweden, and 56% filled prescriptions for diabetes medicines. Mean MPR was 71%, 39% were adherent according to the maximum gap method, and mean persistence was 758 days. Patients with previous CVD showed higher MPR (3%) and lower risk for discontinuing treatment (12%) compared with patients without previous CVD (P < 0.0001).

conclusionsPatients with previous CVD were more likely to be adherent to treatment and had lower risk for discontinuation compared with patients without previous CVD.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsLipidslipid-lowering medicinesmaximum gap methodmedication possession ratiopersistencerefill adherencetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28799214
PMCPMC5656892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.