Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28799083›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2017

Vaccination coverage and mortality after splenectomy: results from an Italian single-centre study.

Antonio Di Sabatino, Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Francesco Paolo Tinozzi, Marina Lanave, Ivana Aquino, Catherine Klersy, Piero Marone, Carlo Marena, Andrea Pietrabissa, Gino Roberto Corazza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Asplenia and spleen hypofunction.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Invasive pneumococcal infection prevention in asplenic patients].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Antonio Di SabatinoFirst Department of Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. a.disabatino@smatteo.pv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-8645
Marco Vincenzo LentiFirst Department of Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Francesco Paolo TinozziDepartment of Surgery, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Marina LanaveBiometry and Clinical Epidemiology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Ivana AquinoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, ASL Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Catherine KlersyBiometry and Clinical Epidemiology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Piero MaroneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Carlo MarenaBiometry and Clinical Epidemiology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea PietrabissaDepartment of Surgery, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Gino Roberto CorazzaFirst Department of Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Splenectomy is a well-recognised risk factor for life-threatening overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). To prevent OPSI, immunisations against encapsulated bacteria (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, H. influenzae) and influenza virus are recommended. However, there is still a lack of uniformity and poor compliance with these recommendations. Following a local physicians' awareness campaign regarding the importance of vaccine prophylaxis of splenectomised patients, we aimed to register vaccination coverage, mortality and infection rates in all patients who underwent splenectomy at our hospital, over a six-year time span. Reasons for splenectomy, patients' compliance with vaccinations, mortality and infectious events were recorded. The reasons for splenectomy in the 216 identified patients (mean age 58.2 ± 14; M:F ratio 1.4:1) were haematologic disorders (38.8%), solid tumours (28.7%), traumatic rupture (22.7%) and other causes (9.7%). A total of 146 patients (67.6%) received at least one of the four vaccines. Overall, the mortality rate was significantly greater in unvaccinated compared to vaccinated patients (p < 0.001), although after the adjustment for the cause of splenectomy the statistical significance was lost (p = 0.085) due to the burden of solid tumour-related mortality. Among the 21 reported cases of OPSI, eight were fatal and five were potentially vaccine-preventable. Our results show that two-thirds of splenectomised patients comply with vaccine prophylaxis. Future interventional studies or ad hoc registries might overcome barriers to vaccination or intentional non-compliance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedSplenectomyVaccinationVaccination CoverageMeningococcalOverwhelming post-splenectomy infectionPneumococcalProphylaxisSplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID28799083
OpenAlexW2742178396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.