ReviewJournal of genetic counseling2018
The Psychosocial Impact of Carrying a Debated Variant in the GLA Gene.
Review in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabry nephropathy as the clinical anchor for kidney-centered metabolic surveillance: linking genetic heterogeneity to early risk identification.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Heterozygous variants of uncertain significance inAME case reports · 2025Article
- A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Newborn Screening Methods for Four Lysosomal Storage Disorders.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020Article
- Patients' views on variants of uncertain significance across indications.Journal of community genetics · 2020Review
- Cardiomyopathy associated with the Ala143Thr variant of theHeart (British Cardiac Society) · 2020Article
- Implementation of Second-Tier Tests in Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Disorders in North Eastern Italy.International journal of neonatal screening · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical significance of the c.427G>A (p.A143T) variant in GLA is a topic of debate within the lysosomal storage disease community. A review of the literature and published case reports found the clinical impact of the variant to range from classic Fabry symptoms to healthy unaffected males with normal alpha- galactosidase enzyme levels, leaving clinicians unsure of how to manage these individuals. As the number of states testing for Fabry disease on their newborn screening panel has increased, more people with this variant are being identified. The goal of this project was to learn how the uncertainty surrounding the clinical significance of the p.A143T variant affects those with this change. A self-response questionnaire was developed to explore this topic. In addition to evaluating participant feelings, the questionnaire explored individuals' beliefs regarding the pathogenicity of the variant. Results suggest that people have diverse feelings regarding reclassification of the p.A143T variant. Around half of those surveyed reported feeling frustrated by the lack of clear information. Despite the ambiguity regarding the health consequences of this variant, many participants felt that knowing this result helps guide medical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28799081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.