ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2017
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Asia.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology and socioeconomic correlates of colorectal cancer in Asia in 2020 and its projection to 2040.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Global burden and cross-country health inequalities of early-onset colorectal cancer and its risk factors from 1990 to 2021 and its projection until 2036.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Clinical Study of Long-Term Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients in Thailand: A 10-Year Follow-Up.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of behavioural economics-based interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening participation: A rapid systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Review
- Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Kazakhstan: Spatio-Temporal Epidemiological Assessment.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Review
- Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines after the Removal of Colorectal Polyps: A Multinational, Multicenter, Prospective Survey.Gut and liver · 2021Article
- Factors predicting improved compliance towards colonoscopy in individuals with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT).Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- IRF1 regulates the progression of colorectal cancer via interferon‑induced proteins.International journal of molecular medicine · 2021Article
- High expression of CDCA7 predicts tumor progression and poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- The impact of screening on the survival of colorectal cancer in Shanghai, China: a population based study.BMC public health · 2019Article
- The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- Health Insurance and Colorectal Cancer Survival in Khon Kaen, Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewColorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in Asia, especially in regions with higher levels of economic development. Several Asian countries have launched population CRC screening programs to combat this devastating disease because previous studies have demonstrated that either fecal occult blood test or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy can effectively reduce CRC mortality. RECENT
findingsScreening includes engaging the population, testing, administering a confirmation examination, and treating screening-detected neoplasms; thus, monitoring the whole process using measurable indicators over time is of utmost importance. Only when the quality of every step is secured can the effectiveness of CRC screening be maximized. Screening and verification examination rates remain low in Asian countries, and important infrastructure, including cancer or death registry systems, colonoscopy capacity, and reasonable subsidization for screening, is lacking or insufficient. Future research should identify potential local barriers to screening. Good communication and dialog among screening organizers, clinicians, professional societies, and public health workers are indispensible for successful screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.