Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28799045›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Trauma laparoscopy: when to start and when to convert?

Oleh Matsevych, Modise Koto, Moses Balabyeki, Colleen Aldous

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Value of laparoscopy in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma-a systematic review].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. The Analysis of Risk Factors in the Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of laparoscopic surgery in managing hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients: a single level I trauma center, propensity score matching study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part I.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  13. Laparoscopy in Trauma: Can Brazil fit into the global trend?Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oleh MatsevychDepartment of Surgery, Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, P.O. Box 231, Pretoria, 0204, South Africa. info@matsevych.com.
Modise KotoDepartment of Surgery, Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, P.O. Box 231, Pretoria, 0204, South Africa.
Moses BalabyekiDepartment of Surgery, Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, P.O. Box 231, Pretoria, 0204, South Africa.
Colleen AldousUniversity of KwaZulu - Natal, Nelson R Mandela (NRMSM) Campus, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of laparoscopy for stable patients with abdominal trauma is increasing and its accuracy is nearly 100%. However, indications for laparoscopy and for conversion differ among centers. The aim of this study was to investigate indications for trauma laparoscopy and for conversion to laparotomy.

methodsAll trauma patients managed with laparoscopy over a 4-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for laparoscopy, morbidity, and reasons for conversion were investigated and predictors of morbidity and conversion were sought. The management algorithm of trauma patients was reviewed and updated.

resultsLaparoscopy was used in 318 stable trauma patients. Thirty-five patients presented with blunt and 283 with penetrating abdominal injuries. The conversion rate was 11.7% for penetrating and 22.9% for blunt abdominal trauma patients. The most common reason for conversion was continuous intraabdominal bleeding that could not be controlled quickly. It was followed by multiple complex injuries, hemodynamic instability, and intraoperative visualization problems. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 45%, and therapeutic laparoscopy in 55% of cases. There were no missed injuries. Complications occurred in 21.2% in the converted group and in 9.6% in the laparoscopic group. Among initial systolic blood pressure, pulse, hemoglobin, lactate, and base deficit levels, only lower pH was associated with conversion.

conclusionThe management of all stable trauma patients with laparoscopy appears to be a safe approach. The use of sound laparoscopic equipment by a well-coordinated trauma team with adequate expertise in laparoscopy, adherence to the algorithm, and strict compliance with predetermined procedural steps are fundamental to success. Continuous intraoperative bleeding, complexity of injuries, deterioration of the patient, poor visibility, and equipment failure are indications for conversion.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAbdominal InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsConversion to Open SurgeryFemaleHemorrhageHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultConversionIndicationLaparoscopyTherapeutic laparoscopyTraumaTrauma laparoscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.