ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018
Hemodynamic assessments of the ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm using fluid-structure interaction approach.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interaction of the Blood Components with Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Wall: Biomechanical and Fluid Analyses.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- NO-HYPE: a novel hydrodynamic phantom for the evaluation of MRI flow measurements.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Biomechanical Characterization of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Multiobjective design optimization of stent geometry with wall deformation for triangular and rectangular struts.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2019Article
- Bio-chemo-mechanics of thoracic aortic aneurysms.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current assessment and management of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) rely heavily on the diameter of the ATAA and blood pressure rather than biomechanical and hemodynamic parameters such as arterial wall deformation or wall shear stress. The objective of the current study was to develop an accurate computational method for modeling the mechanical responses of the ATAA to provide additional information in patient evaluations. Fully coupled fluid structure interaction simulations were conducted using data from cases with ATAA with measured geometrical parameters in order to evaluate and analyze the change in biomechanical responses under normotensive and hypertensive conditions. Anisotropic hyperelastic material property estimates were applied to the ATAA data which represented three different geometrical configurations of ATAAs. The resulting analysis showed significant variations in maximum wall shear stress despite minimal differences in flow velocity between two blood pressure conditions. Additionally, the three different ATAA conditions identified different aortic expansions that were not uniform under pulsatile pressure. The elevated wall stress with hypertension was also geometry-dependent. The developed models suggest that ATTA cases have unique characteristic in biomechanical and hemodynamic evaluations that can be useful in risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28798988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.