Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28798874›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgical oncology2017

Results from Survey to Assess Current Trends in Surgical Practice in the Management of Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer within the BGCS Community with an Emphasis on Routine Frozen Section Examination.

Kumar Gubbala, Alexandros Laios, Thulumuru Kavitha Madhuri, Pubudu Pathiraja, Krishnayan Haldar, Sean Kehoe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The intelligent knife (iKnife) and its intraoperative diagnostic advantage for the treatment of cervical disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kumar GubbalaGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Alexandros LaiosGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-7393
Thulumuru Kavitha MadhuriDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Pubudu PathirajaGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4041-9466
Krishnayan HaldarGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Sean KehoeSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Churchill Hospital · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the UK, more than 3,200 new cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed each year. Early stage cervical cancer (IA2-IB1) treatment comprises central surgery mainly in the form of radical hysterectomy or fertility sparing surgery including trachelectomy as well as systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy to detect metastases and adjust treatment accordingly. Given the variation in determining the lymph node (LN) status, a major prognosticator, we reviewed the current UK practice of LN assessment in women undergoing surgery for early cervical cancer. A 7-question, web-based survey, screened by the BGCS committee, was circulated amongst BGCS members. The overall response rate was 51%. Only 12.5% of the respondents routinely performed frozen section examination (FSE); the main reasons for not doing FSE were the pressure on theatre time (54.5%) and the lack of available facilities (48.5%). When positive pelvic nodal disease was detected, in 21 out of 50 (42%) the planned radical hysterectomy (RH) was aborted. More than 70% of the respondents routinely performed RH without any prior resort to pelvic lymphadenectomy. Pretreatment surgical para-aortic LN assessment was performed by 20% of the respondents. The survey confirms the diversity of the UK practice patterns in the surgical treatment of early cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Frozen SectionsHysterectomyFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm StagingTrachelectomyUnited KingdomUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28798874
PMCPMC5535699
OpenAlexW2735093313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.