ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2017
Fiber-reinforced scaffolds in soft tissue engineering.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cotton-Type Nanofiber Guided Pathway Engineering Enables Rapid Tissue Integration and Accelerated Bone Regeneration in Mineral Powder-Based Bone Grafts.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun PCL/GelMA Composite Scaffolds for Muscle Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Fabrication of PCL Blended Highly Aligned Nanofiber Yarn from Dual-Nozzle Electrospinning System and Evaluation of the Influence on Introducing Collagen and Tropoelastin.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- The Immunologic Spectrum of Biostimulators and Its Clinical Importance.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Strategies for the vascular patterning of engineered tissues for organ repair.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Innovative Micro- and Nano-Architectures in Biomedical Engineering for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Endocytosis-mediated healing: recombinant human collagen type III chain-induced wound healing for scar-free recovery.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Developing strategies to optimize the anchorage between electrospun nanofibers and hydrogels for multi-layered plasmonic biomaterials.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Lifelike Transformative Materials for Biohybrid Implants: Inspired by Nature, Driven by Technology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Hydrogels for Oral Tissue Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Fiber diameters and parallel patterns: proliferation and osteogenesis of stem cells.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- Fabrication and Evaluation of Electrospun Silk Fibroin/Halloysite Nanotube Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Regeneration.Polymers · 2022Article
- Progress in the Development of Graphene-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 3D-Printed Reinforcement Scaffolds with Targeted Biodegradation Properties for the Tissue Engineering of Articular Cartilage.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Article
- Long-Term Evaluation of Allogenic Chondrocyte-Loaded PVA-PCL IPN Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair in Rabbits.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Paramagnetic Functionalization of Biocompatible Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications: A Perspective.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Role of Two-Step Blending in the Properties of Starch/Chitin/Polylactic Acid Biodegradable Composites for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2020Article
- Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review.Bioactive materials · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft tissue engineering has been developed as a new strategy for repairing damaged or diseased soft tissues and organs to overcome the limitations of current therapies. Since most of soft tissues in the human body are usually supported by collagen fibers to form a three-dimensional microstructure, fiber-reinforced scaffolds have the advantage to mimic the structure, mechanical and biological environment of natural soft tissues, which benefits for their regeneration and remodeling. This article reviews and discusses the latest research advances on design and manufacture of novel fiber-reinforced scaffolds for soft tissue repair and how fiber addition affects their structural characteristics, mechanical strength and biological activities
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.