Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28798829›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2017

Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect patient pathological outcome? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Marc Zanaty, Mansour Alnazari, Kelsey Lawson, Mounsif Azizi, Emad Rajih, Abdullah Alenizi, Pierre-Alain Hueber, Malek Meskawi, Cedric Lebacle, Thierry Lebeau and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc ZanatyDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mansour AlnazariDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kelsey LawsonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mounsif AziziDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Emad RajihDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abdullah AleniziDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pierre-Alain HueberDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Malek MeskawiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Cedric LebacleDepartment of Urology, CHU Mondor, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France.
Thierry LebeauDivision of Robotic Urology, Department of Surgery, Hôpital du Sacré Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Serge BenayounDivision of Robotic Urology, Department of Surgery, Hôpital du Sacré Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pierre I KarakiewiczDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Assaad El-HakimDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kevin C ZornDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe sought to assess the impact of surgical wait time (SWT) to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on final pathological outcome.

methodsA retrospective review of RARP patient records operated between 2006 and 2015 was conducted. SWT was defined as period from prostate biopsy to surgery. Primary outcome was the impact on postoperative Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA-S) score. Patients were stratified according to D'Amico risk categories. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analysis with a generalized linear model was used to evaluate the effect of SWT and other predictive factors on pathological outcome in individual risk group and on the overall sample.

resultsA total of 835 patients were eligible for analysis. Mean SWT was significantly different between the three D'Amico groups, with mean SWT of 180.22 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 169.03; 191.41), 159.14 days (95% CI 152.38; 165.90), and 138.96 days (95% CI 124.60; 153.33) for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (p<0.001). After stratification by D'Amico risk group, no significant association was observed between SWT and CAPRA-S score in the three risk categories on UVA and MVA. Predictors of higher CAPRA-S score in the multivariable model in the overall cohort were: older age (p=0.014), biopsy Gleason score (p<0.001), percentage of positive cores (p<0.001), and clinical stage (p<0.001).

conclusionsIn the present study evaluating SWT for RARP in a Canadian socialized system, increased delay for surgery does not appear to impact the pathological outcome. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of wait time on biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.

Identifiers

PMID28798829
PMCPMC5542836
OpenAlexW2744740679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.