Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28798828›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2017

Dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy vs. ultrasound for renal parenchymal defects in children.

Maryse Marceau-Grimard, Audrey Marion, Christian Côté, Stephane Bolduc, Marcel Dumont, Katherine Moore

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maryse Marceau-GrimardDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery; CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Audrey MarionDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery; CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Christian CôtéDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging; CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Stephane BolducDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery; CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Marcel DumontDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging; CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Katherine MooreDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery; CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy is the gold standard in the evaluation of renal parenchymal defects and is widely used in the pediatric population. As more recent ultrasound equipment was purchased at our tertiary pediatric centre, our objective was to evaluate if renal ultrasound (US) results are equivalent or sufficient when compared to DMSA scintigraphy in the assessment of renal anomalies.

methodsThe charts of all 463 patients who underwent DMSA scintigraphy between January 2009 and May 2014 at our pediatric tertiary centre were reviewed. The objective was to look for correlation between US and DMSA scan results for renal scars/dysplasia. A hundred and sixty pediatric patients followed with US and DMSA scan for a total of 285 renal units remained for evaluation after exclusions. Timing of the exams, urinary tract infection (UTI), and indication for imaging were reviewed. Results with older (105 patients) and newer (55 patients) US equipment were compared.

resultsAmong the 285 renal units evaluated, 39 (14%) had renal parenchymal defects shown by US and 87 (31%) by DMSA scintigraphy (sensitivity 36%, specificity 96%). The DMSA scan was normal for eight abnormal kidneys (3%) on US. The results were not statistically significant when compared to exams performed with newer or older US machines.

conclusionsAt our institution, US data are not sensitive enough to give reliable information about renal parenchymal defects, even with newer equipment. DMSA scintigraphy still remains mandatory for the evaluation of renal anomalies, but could be optional if the US exam indicates parenchymal defects.

Identifiers

PMID28798828
PMCPMC5542835
OpenAlexW2742449530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.