Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28798619›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2010

Barriers to senior citizens' outdoor mobility in Europe.

Ralf Risser, Gudrun Haindl, Agneta Ståhl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Attitudes of Polish Seniors toward the Use of Public Space during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mobility, Out-of-Home Activity Participation and Needs Fulfilment in Later Life.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People's Mobility and Well-Being.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ralf RisserFACTUM OHG, Danhausergasse 6/4, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Gudrun HaindlDepartment of Spatial Development, Infrastructure and Environmental Planning, Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology, Operngasse 11/6, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Agneta StåhlDepartment of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to picture perceived problems amongst older citizens in the traffic environment. Moreover, answers to the question why measures that are known to be efficient concerning the mobility of senior citizens are often not implemented. Eight EU countries participated in the study, involving both senior citizens and experts (researchers, decision makers and practitioners who deal with all aspects of seniors' mobility). Focus group interviews and personal interviews involving 487 senior citizens and 225 experts were carried out in order to chart problems. These were followed by quantitative surveys with 3,309 senior citizens and 490 experts that had the scope to measure the distribution of charted problems in the population. Finally, five workshops were carried out in order to discuss results and to formulate assumptions why promising measures are not implemented, as it appears. Barriers to mobility are by both experts and senior citizens attributed to traffic and infrastructure characteristics, to legal issues, to vehicle design problems, to inter-personal and inter-generational frictions, to lacking lobby power, but also to individual health problems. In order to improve mobility it is suggested by both senior citizens and experts to enforce vehicle speeds. Both groups also agree that public transport vehicles should be brought into an appropriate standard (low floor vehicles, kneeling busses). Senior citizens more than the experts ask for measures to support the sense of security and safety in the public space (police should be visible, appropriate design of infrastructure, public lighting).

Indexed as

ImplementationMobility preconditionsQuality of lifeSenior citizensUser-oriented approach

Identifiers

PMID28798619
PMCPMC5547331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.