Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28798357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Origin and dispersal of early domestic pigs in northern China.

Hai Xiang, Jianqiang Gao, Dawei Cai, Yunbing Luo, Baoquan Yu, Langqing Liu, Ranran Liu, Hui Zhou, Xiaoyong Chen, Weitao Dun and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ancient DNA reveals pig domestication history in Northeastern China.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of MutantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hai XiangNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Ministry of Agricultural Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction; and College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jianqiang GaoHebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relic, Shijiazhuang, 050031, China.
Dawei CaiAncient DNA Laboratory, Research Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130023, China.
Yunbing LuoHubei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Wuhan, 430077, China.
Baoquan YuXushui County Office for Preservation of Ancient Monuments, Xushui, 072550, China.
Langqing LiuNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Ministry of Agricultural Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction; and College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ranran LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hui ZhouAncient DNA Laboratory, Research Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130023, China.
Xiaoyong ChenInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary of Hebei Province, Baoding, 071000, China.
Weitao DunInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary of Hebei Province, Baoding, 071000, China.
Xi WangInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Michael HofreiterFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Potsdam, 14476, Germany. Michael.hofreiter@uni-potsdam.de.
Xingbo ZhaoNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Ministry of Agricultural Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction; and College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. zhxb@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that modern pigs were domesticated independently at least twice, and Chinese native pigs are deemed as direct descendants of the first domesticated pigs in the corresponding domestication centers. By analyzing mitochondrial DNA sequences of an extensive sample set spanning 10,000 years, we find that the earliest pigs from the middle Yellow River region already carried the maternal lineages that are dominant in both younger archaeological populations and modern Chinese pigs. Our data set also supports early Neolithic pig utilization and a long-term in situ origin for northeastern Chinese pigs during 8,000-3,500 BP, suggesting a possibly independent domestication in northeast China. Additionally, we observe a genetic replacement in ancient northeast Chinese pigs since 3,500 BP. The results not only provide increasing evidence for pig origin in the middle Yellow River region but also depict an outline for the process of early pig domestication in northeast China.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticChinaDNA, MitochondrialDomesticationEvolution, MolecularMitochondriaPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASus scrofaDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID28798357
PMCPMC5552793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.