ArticleScientific reports2017
Revealing extracellular electron transfer mediated parasitism: energetic considerations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in genetic and metabolic engineering of Geobacter sulfurreducens for bioelectrochemical systems: a bibliometric analysis.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Electrochemical Characterization of Two Gut Microbial Strains Cooperatively Promoting Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Phenotype analysis of cultivation processes via unsupervised machine learning: Demonstration forEngineering in life sciences · 2022Article
- Mechanisms underlying Clostridium pasteurianum's metabolic shift when grown with Geobacter sulfurreducens.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Four species of bacteria deterministically assemble to form a stable biofilm in a millifluidic channel.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular electron transfer (EET) is a mechanism that allows energetic coupling between two microorganisms or between a microorganism and an electrode surface. EET is either supported by direct physical contacts or mediated by electron shuttles. So far, studies dealing with interspecies EET (so-called IET) have mainly focused on possible syntrophic interactions between microorganisms favoured by this mechanism. In this article, the case of fermentative bacteria receiving extracellular electrons while fermenting a substrate is considered. A thermodynamical analysis based on metabolic energy balances was applied to re-investigate experimental data from the literature. Results suggest that the observations of a decrease of cell biomass yields of fermentative electron-accepting species, as mostly reported, can be unravelled by EET energetics and correspond to parasitism in case of IET. As an illustration, the growth yield decrease of Propionibacterium freudenreichii (-14%) observed in electro-fermentation experiments was fully explained by EET energetics when electrons were used by this species at a potential of -0.12 ± 0.01 V vs SHE. Analysis of other cases showed that, in addition to EET energetics in Clostridium pasteurianum, biological regulations can also be involved in such biomass yield decrease (-33% to -38%). Interestingly, the diminution of bacterial biomass production is always concomitant with an increased production of reduced compounds making IET-mediated parasitism and electro-fermentation attractive ways to optimize carbon fluxes in fermentation processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.