Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28798270›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Pictilisib in Combination with Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Stephen Leong, Rebecca A Moss, Daniel W Bowles, Joseph A Ware, Jing Zhou, Jill M Spoerke, Mark R Lackner, Geetha Shankar, Jennifer L Schutzman, Ruud van der Noll and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing influenza virus treatment:Materials today. Bio · 2025
    Article
  2. PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway as a Target for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. PI3K Isoform Immunotherapy for Solid Tumours.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. PI3K Inhibitors in Cancer: Clinical Implications and Adverse Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Combination of KRAS gene silencing and PI3K inhibition for ovarian cancer treatment.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen LeongDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA stephen.leong@ucdenver.edu.
Rebecca A MossRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Daniel W BowlesDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Joseph A WareGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Jing ZhouGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Jill M SpoerkeGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Mark R LacknerGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Geetha ShankarGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Jennifer L SchutzmanGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Ruud van der NollDivision of Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emile E VoestDivision of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan H M SchellensDivision of Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oncode Institute · NLRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) are involved in the proliferation and survival of many cancer types. Enhanced antitumor activity may be achieved through combined inhibition of these pathways. We report results for pictilisib (GDC-0941, a class I pan-PI3K inhibitor) plus erlotinib (an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 3 + 3 dose-escalation study was carried out at a starting daily dose of 60 mg pictilisib on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and 150 mg erlotinib from day 2 of cycle 1. The primary objectives of the study were to assess safety and tolerability, identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), estimate the maximum tolerated dose, and identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Evaluation of a dose-expansion cohort at the RP2D was performed.

resultsFifty-seven patients were treated in the study. All patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE). Grade ≥3 AEs, serious AEs, and deaths were reported in 38 (66.7%), 19 (33.3%), and 4 (7.0%) patients, respectively. DLTs occurred in nine patients across eight cohorts and the RP2D was determined to be 340 mg pictilisib on a "5 days on, 2 days off" schedule plus 100 mg erlotinib. Two patients (3.5%) experienced partial response and 19 (33.3%) had stable disease.

conclusionCombining pictilisib with erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors is feasible; however, antitumor activity is limited. Additional studies may identify patients likely to benefit from combined inhibition of EGFR and PI3K pathways. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Combining drugs targeting different signaling pathways in cancer growth and survival could overcome drug resistance and improve antitumor activity. In this first-in-human study for the combination, addition of the PI3K inhibitor pictilisib to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib resulted in toxicity that led to dose and schedule modifications to identify a tolerable recommended phase II dose of 340 mg pictilisib on a "5 days on, 2 days off" schedule plus 100 mg erlotinib daily. The limited antitumor activity observed, however, suggests that additional studies are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from combined EGFR and PI3K inhibition.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansIndazolesMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases2-(1H-indazol-4-yl)-6-(4-methanesulfonylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-4-morpholin-4-ylthieno(3,2-d)pyrimidineEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideIndazolesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSulfonamidesEpidermal growth factor receptorEpidermal growth factor receptor inhibitorErlotinibErlotinib hydrochloridePhase I clinical trialPhosphatidylinositol 3‐kinasePhosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase inhibitorPictilisibReceptor protein‐tyrosine kinases

Identifiers

PMID28798270
PMCPMC5728021
OpenAlexW2743115042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.