ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Reply to Silburt et al.: Concerning sterile inflammation following focused ultrasound and microbubbles in the brain.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- BBB opening by low pulsed electric fields, depicted by delayed-contrast MRI, enables efficient delivery of therapeutic doxorubicin doses into mice brains.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic response of brain tissue to focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption depends strongly on anesthesia.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2021Article
- Secondary effects on brain physiology caused by focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020Review
- Ultrasound-Responsive Cavitation Nuclei for Therapy and Drug Delivery.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Review
- Investigating the effects of dexamethasone on blood-brain barrier permeability and inflammatory response following focused ultrasound and microbubble exposure.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI Evaluation on the Long-Term Effects of Pulsed Focused Ultrasound and Microbubbles Blood Brain Barrier Opening in the Rat.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- In vivo imaging of sterile microglial activation in rat brain after disrupting the blood-brain barrier with pulsed focused ultrasound: [18F]DPA-714 PET study.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2019Article
- Reverse engineering the ultrasound contrast agent.Advances in colloid and interface science · 2018Review
- Angiogenic response of rat hippocampal vasculature to focused ultrasound-mediated increases in blood-brain barrier permeability.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- State-of-the-art of microbubble-assisted blood-brain barrier disruption.Theranostics · 2018Review
- MRI and histological evaluation of pulsed focused ultrasound and microbubbles treatment effects in the brain.Theranostics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.