Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28797684›Full record

ArticleUrology2017

Surgical and Functional Outcomes Following Buried Penis Repair With Limited Panniculectomy and Split-thickness Skin Graft.

Lindsay A Hampson, Wade Muncey, Paul H Chung, C C Ma, Jeffrey Friedrich, Hunter Wessells, Bryan B Voelzke

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06260241 (Gain in Stretched Penile Length After Phalloplasty With & Without Penile Traction in Children.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06260241 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Gain in Stretched Penile Length After Phalloplasty With & Without Penile Traction in Children.

TypeinterventionalSponsorShaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreRan2023 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsConcealed PenisArmsTraction Dressing, Without Traction Dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The outcomes of surgical management options for adult acquired buried penis.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Skin Grafting Applications in Urology.Reviews in urology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Buried penis repair: tips and tricks.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay A HampsonDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Wade MunceyUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Paul H ChungDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
C C MaUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Jeffrey FriedrichDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Hunter WessellsDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Bryan B VoelzkeDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: voelzke@uw.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

UCSF KURe Career Development ProgramK12DK083021 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASKIN, LAURENCE, CARROLL, PETER R · 2008 to 2017
$5.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK083021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report surgical and functional outcomes of buried penis surgery.

methodsOutcomes following buried penis surgery at the University of Washington were assessed from June 1, 2005 to June 1, 2016. Patient demographic and surgical data were abstracted from a retrospective chart review. All patients were attempted to be contacted by phone for long-term follow-up. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate for association with any complication.

resultsA total of 42 men underwent buried penis repair surgery (mean short-term follow-up 8.1 months). There was an overall 33% 90-day complication rate (21 events). In univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI; P = .02) and no history of gastric bypass (P = .03) were significant predictors of any complication. In multivariate analysis, only BMI remained significant (odds ratio 1.1 for each increase in unit of BMI, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.27). Twenty-seven patients were reached for long-term follow-up (mean 39 months). Patients reported improvements in every functional domain that was assessed. Of the patients, 85% reported they would undergo buried penis surgery again, 74% that surgery led to a positive change in their lives, and 85% that the surgery had remained a long-term success.

conclusionSurgical correction of buried penis with penile split-thickness skin graft and limited panniculectomy is well tolerated and results in functional, long-term improvements. BMI is associated with an increased likelihood of a complication following surgery.

Indexed as

AbdominoplastySkin TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPenisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male

Identifiers

PMID28797684
PMCPMC7025816
OpenAlexW2743938580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.