ArticleUrology2017
Surgical and Functional Outcomes Following Buried Penis Repair With Limited Panniculectomy and Split-thickness Skin Graft.
Article in Urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06260241 (Gain in Stretched Penile Length After Phalloplasty With & Without Penile Traction in Children.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Gain in Stretched Penile Length After Phalloplasty With & Without Penile Traction in Children.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of adult acquired buried penis (AABP) reconstruction: a multicentre cohort study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Observational
- No difference between split-thickness and full-thickness skin grafts for surgical repair in adult acquired buried penis regarding surgical and functional outcomes: a comparative retrospective analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Concealed penis: A review of multilevel classification and surgical reconstruction techniques.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- Acquired buried penis: an observational study characterizing the variability in procedural codes reported during surgery.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- The Outcomes of Adult Acquired Buried Penis Surgical Reconstruction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The outcomes of surgical management options for adult acquired buried penis.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- The concealed morbidity of buried penis: a narrative review of our progress in understanding adult-acquired buried penis as a surgical condition.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Surgical management and outcomes of adult acquired buried penis with and without lichen sclerosus: a comparative analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2020Article
- Predictors of surgical complications and evaluation of outcomes after surgical correction of adult-acquired buried penis.International urology and nephrology · 2020Article
- Prevalence and surgical management of concurrent adult acquired buried penis and urethral stricture disease.World journal of urology · 2019Article
- Skin Grafting Applications in Urology.Reviews in urology · 2019Review
- Commentary on "A modified fixation technique for the cure of buried penis in children".Asian journal of andrologyArticle
- Buried penis repair: tips and tricks.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo report surgical and functional outcomes of buried penis surgery.
methodsOutcomes following buried penis surgery at the University of Washington were assessed from June 1, 2005 to June 1, 2016. Patient demographic and surgical data were abstracted from a retrospective chart review. All patients were attempted to be contacted by phone for long-term follow-up. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate for association with any complication.
resultsA total of 42 men underwent buried penis repair surgery (mean short-term follow-up 8.1 months). There was an overall 33% 90-day complication rate (21 events). In univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI; P = .02) and no history of gastric bypass (P = .03) were significant predictors of any complication. In multivariate analysis, only BMI remained significant (odds ratio 1.1 for each increase in unit of BMI, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.27). Twenty-seven patients were reached for long-term follow-up (mean 39 months). Patients reported improvements in every functional domain that was assessed. Of the patients, 85% reported they would undergo buried penis surgery again, 74% that surgery led to a positive change in their lives, and 85% that the surgery had remained a long-term success.
conclusionSurgical correction of buried penis with penile split-thickness skin graft and limited panniculectomy is well tolerated and results in functional, long-term improvements. BMI is associated with an increased likelihood of a complication following surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.