ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2017
Going deeper in the automated identification of Herbarium specimens.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identification of biomarker genes from multiple studies for abiotic stress in maize through machine learning.Journal of biosciences · 2024Pooled it
- Deep Learning in Plant Phenological Research: A Systematic Literature Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Pooled it
- Herbarium specimens in the age of artificial intelligence: from herbarium image identification to Integrative Taxonomic AI.Journal of plant research · 2026Article
- Improving the accuracy of automated labeling of specimen images datasets via a confidence-based process.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the method reproducibility of deep learning models in biodiversity research.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- The digitisation workflow of the herbarium of the State Museum of Natural History of the NAS of Ukraine (LWS).Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- Using deep learning artificial intelligence for sex identification and taxonomy of sand fly species.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Geographical-Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important FamilyBiology · 2024Article
- High rate of species misidentification reduces the taxonomic certainty of European biodiversity databases of ivies (Hedera L.).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identification of herbarium specimen sheet components from high-resolution images using deep learning.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Classifying Circumnutation in Pea Plants via Supervised Machine Learning.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recognizability bias in citizen science photographs.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Envisaging a global infrastructure to exploit the potential of digitised collections.Biodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Development of a system for the automated identification of herbarium specimens with high accuracy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Help in the Study of Vegetative Growth Patterns from Herbarium Collections? An Evaluation of the Tropical Flora of the French Guiana Forest.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automatic Fungi Recognition: Deep Learning Meets Mycology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Plant Species Classification Based on Hyperspectral ImagingFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Using Deep Learning to Identify Costa Rican Native Tree Species From Wood Cut Images.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHundreds of herbarium collections have accumulated a valuable heritage and knowledge of plants over several centuries. Recent initiatives started ambitious preservation plans to digitize this information and make it available to botanists and the general public through web portals. However, thousands of sheets are still unidentified at the species level while numerous sheets should be reviewed and updated following more recent taxonomic knowledge. These annotations and revisions require an unrealistic amount of work for botanists to carry out in a reasonable time. Computer vision and machine learning approaches applied to herbarium sheets are promising but are still not well studied compared to automated species identification from leaf scans or pictures of plants in the field.
resultsIn this work, we propose to study and evaluate the accuracy with which herbarium images can be potentially exploited for species identification with deep learning technology. In addition, we propose to study if the combination of herbarium sheets with photos of plants in the field is relevant in terms of accuracy, and finally, we explore if herbarium images from one region that has one specific flora can be used to do transfer learning to another region with other species; for example, on a region under-represented in terms of collected data.
conclusionsThis is, to our knowledge, the first study that uses deep learning to analyze a big dataset with thousands of species from herbaria. Results show the potential of Deep Learning on herbarium species identification, particularly by training and testing across different datasets from different herbaria. This could potentially lead to the creation of a semi, or even fully automated system to help taxonomists and experts with their annotation, classification, and revision works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.