Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28797196›Full record

ReviewJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2017

The IMPROVE Guidelines (Ischaemia Models: Procedural Refinements Of in Vivo Experiments).

Nathalie Percie du Sert, Alessio Alfieri, Stuart M Allan, Hilary Vo Carswell, Graeme A Deuchar, Tracy D Farr, Paul Flecknell, Lindsay Gallagher, Claire L Gibson, Michael J Haley and 20 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. UK consensus on pre-clinical vascular cognitive impairment functional outcomes assessment: Questionnaire and workshop proceedings.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Animal stroke models and outcome evaluation: A review.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Improving physiological monitoring and reporting standards in preclinical stroke research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Nathalie Percie du Sert1 National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, UK.
Alessio Alfieri2 The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK.
Stuart M Allan3 Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hilary Vo Carswell4 Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Graeme A Deuchar5 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow/Arum Biosciences, Glasgow, UK.
Tracy D Farr6 School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, UK.
Paul Flecknell7 Comparative Biology Centre, Newcastle University, UK.
Lindsay Gallagher5 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow/Arum Biosciences, Glasgow, UK.
Claire L Gibson8 Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Michael J Haley3 Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Malcolm R Macleod9 Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Barry W McColl2 The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK.
Christopher McCabe5 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow/Arum Biosciences, Glasgow, UK.
Anna Morancho10 Neurovascular Research Laboratory. Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain.
Lawrence Df Moon11 Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael J O'Neill12 Eli Lilly and Co., Windlesham, Surrey, UK.
Isabel Pérez de Puig13 Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona (IIBB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Planas13 Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona (IIBB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
C Ian Ragan14 NC3Rs Board, London, UK.
Anna Rosell10 Neurovascular Research Laboratory. Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain.
Lisa A Roy5 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow/Arum Biosciences, Glasgow, UK.
Kathryn O Ryder15 Home Office, London, UK.
Alba Simats10 Neurovascular Research Laboratory. Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain.
Emily S Sena9 Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Brad A Sutherland16 Acute Stroke Programme, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark D Tricklebank18 Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Rebecca C Trueman6 School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, UK.
Lucy Whitfield19 Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Raymond Wong3 Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
I Mhairi Macrae5 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow/Arum Biosciences, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20251969British Heart Foundation PG/13/8/29989Chief Scientist Office ETM/146Medical Research Council G0400052Medical Research Council G0700439Medical Research Council MR/L003384/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/L000970/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/M001598/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most in vivo models of ischaemic stroke target the middle cerebral artery and a spectrum of stroke severities, from mild to substantial, can be achieved. This review describes opportunities to improve the in vivo modelling of ischaemic stroke and animal welfare. It provides a number of recommendations to minimise the level of severity in the most common rodent models of middle cerebral artery occlusion, while sustaining or improving the scientific outcomes. The recommendations cover basic requirements pre-surgery, selecting the most appropriate anaesthetic and analgesic regimen, as well as intraoperative and post-operative care. The aim is to provide support for researchers and animal care staff to refine their procedures and practices, and implement small incremental changes to improve the welfare of the animals used and to answer the scientific question under investigation. All recommendations are recapitulated in a summary poster (see supplementary information).

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal WelfareBrain IschemiaDisease Models, AnimalGuidelines as TopicHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryStroke3Rsanimal welfareguidelinesmiddle cerebral artery occlusionstroke

Identifiers

PMID28797196
PMCPMC5669349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.