Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28797125›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Accuracy and reproducibility of mouse cortical bone microporosity as quantified by desktop microcomputed tomography.

Haniyeh Hemmatian, Michaël R Laurent, Samaneh Ghazanfari, Dirk Vanderschueren, Astrid D Bakker, Jenneke Klein-Nulend, G Harry van Lenthe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Altered canalicular remodeling associated with femur fracture in mice.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Enhanced Bone Remodeling After Fracture Priming.Calcified tissue international · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aging, Osteocytes, and Mechanotransduction.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017
    Review
  12. Frontiers in materials · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Haniyeh HemmatianBiomechanics Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michaël R LaurentLaboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Samaneh GhazanfariAachen-Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials, Department of Humanities and Sciences, Maastricht University, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Dirk VanderschuerenClinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Astrid D BakkerDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jenneke Klein-NulendDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G Harry van LentheBiomechanics Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8303-4959
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLKU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone's microporosity plays important roles in bone biology and bone mechanical quality. In this study, we explored the accuracy and reproducibility of nondestructive desktop μCT for 3D visualization and subsequent morphometric analysis of mouse cortical bone microporosity including the vascular canal network and osteocyte lacunae. The accuracy of measurements was evaluated in five murine fibula using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) in conjunction with Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) staining as the reference method. The reproducibility of μCT-derived cortical bone microstructural indices was examined in 10 fibulae of C57Bl/6J male mice at a nominal resolution of 700 nanometer. Three repeated measurements were made on different days. An excellent correlation between μCT and CLSM was observed for both mean lacuna volume (r = 0.98, p = 0.002) and for mean lacuna orientation (r = 0.93, p = 0.02). Whereas the two techniques showed no significant differences for these parameters, the mean lacuna sphericity acquired from μCT was significantly higher than CLSM (p = 0.01). Reproducibility was high, with precision errors (PE) of 1.57-4.69% for lacuna parameters, and of 1.01-9.45% for vascular canal parameters. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed a high reliability of the measurements, ranging from 0.998-1.000 for cortical parameters, 0.973-0.999 for vascular canal parameters and 0.755-0.991 for lacuna parameters. In conclusion, desktop μCT is a valuable tool to quantify the 3D characteristics of bone vascular canals as well as lacunae which can be applied to intact murine bones with high accuracy and reproducibility. Thus, μCT might be an important tool to improve our understanding of the physiological and biomechanical significance of these cannular and lacunar structure in cortical bone.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBone DensityCortical BoneFemaleImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ConfocalReproducibility of ResultsX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID28797125
PMCPMC5552254
OpenAlexW2743340486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.