Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28797064›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Bacteriological profiling of diphenylureas as a novel class of antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Haroon Mohammad, Waleed Younis, Hany G Ezzat, Christine E Peters, Ahmed AbdelKhalek, Bruce Cooper, Kit Pogliano, Joe Pogliano, Abdelrahman S Mayhoub, Mohamed N Seleem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SFRSC medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A How-To Guide for Mode of Action Analysis of Antimicrobial Peptides.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Haroon MohammadDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-8933
Waleed YounisDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Hany G EzzatDepartment of Organic Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Christine E PetersDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Ahmed AbdelKhalekDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Bruce CooperBindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Kit PoglianoDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Joe PoglianoDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Abdelrahman S MayhoubDepartment of Organic Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed N SeleemDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of California San Diego · USAl-Azhar University · EGSouth Valley University · EG

Funding

Identification of natural products targeting new pathways in bacteriaR01AI113295 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POGLIANO, JOSEPH A, POGLIANO, KIT J · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics remains an imposing global public health challenge. Of the most serious pathogens, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is problematic given strains have emerged that exhibit resistance to several antibiotic classes including β-lactams and agents of last resort such as vancomycin. New antibacterial agents composed of unique chemical scaffolds are needed to counter this public health challenge. The present study examines two synthetic diphenylurea compounds 1 and 2 that inhibit growth of clinically-relevant isolates of MRSA at concentrations as low as 4 µg/mL and are non-toxic to human colorectal cells at concentrations up to 128 μg/mL. Both compounds exhibit rapid bactericidal activity, completely eliminating a high inoculum of MRSA within four hours. MRSA mutants exhibiting resistance to 1 and 2 could not be isolated, indicating a low likelihood of rapid resistance emerging to these compounds. Bacterial cytological profiling revealed the diphenylureas exert their antibacterial activity by targeting bacterial cell wall synthesis. Both compounds demonstrate the ability to resensitize vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to the effect of vancomycin. The present study lays the foundation for further investigation and development of diphenylurea compounds as a new class of antibacterial agents.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbanilidesHumansMethicillinMethicillin ResistanceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbanilidesMethicillinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID28797064
PMCPMC5552351
OpenAlexW2742573601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.