Trial reportCardiovascular therapeutics2017
Predictors of candesartan's effect on vascular reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease.
Trial report in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of candesartan's effect on vascular reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2017Trial
- Association of vascular endothelial function and quality of life in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.Heart and vessels · 2023Observational
- Candesartan Does Not Activate PPARγ and Its Target Genes in Early Gestation Trophoblasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Xin-Ji-Er-Kang Alleviates Myocardial Infarction-Induced Cardiovascular Remodeling in Rats by Inhibiting Endothelial Dysfunction.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsEndothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness have a prognostic value on adverse long-term outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We evaluated the efficacy on vascular reactivity of candesartan and analyzed predictors to control the candesartan's effect on vascular reactivity in CAD patients.
methodPatients were prospectively enrolled and prescribed candesartan for 6 months. The effect on vascular reactivity was evaluated by the change in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulse wave velocity (PWV).
resultsA total of 124 patients completed the study. The better responder in FMD change (≥1.3%) showed significantly lower baseline FMD than the poor responder (P < .001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, baseline FMD 7.5% showed optimal predictive value (sensitivity 79%, specificity 79%) for predicting better responder. The baseline endothelial dysfunction (FMD <7.5%) was the only significant predictor of the better responder to candesartan. The better responder in PWV change (≤-100 cm/s) showed greater blood pressure lowering and significantly higher baseline PWV than the poor responder (both P < .05). The poor responder in both FMD and PWV showed a higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (38.7% vs 17.2%, P = .013).
conclusionThe candesartan's effect on vascular reactivity is more pronounced in patients with more severe endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness. Poor responders on both FMD and PWV showed higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.