Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28796573›Full record

ReviewNucleic acid therapeutics2017

Development of Exon Skipping Therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Critical Review and a Perspective on the Outstanding Issues.

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus, Volker Straub, Robert Hemmings, Manuel Haas, Gabriele Schlosser-Weber, Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska, Eugenio Mercuri, Francesco Muntoni, Bruno Sepodes, Elizabeth Vroom and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Viltolarsen in Japanese Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients: A phase 1/2 study.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Splice Modulation Studies Using Reporter Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clickable RNA via 4'-Bioconjugate chemistry · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus1 Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, the Netherlands .
Volker Straub2 John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Robert Hemmings3 Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency , London, United Kingdom .
Manuel Haas4 Central Nervous System and Ophthalmology, Scientific and Regulatory Management Department, Human Medicines Evaluation Division, European Medicines Agency , London, United Kingdom .
Gabriele Schlosser-Weber5 Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte , Bonn, Germany .
Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska6 Medicines Evaluation Board , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
Eugenio Mercuri7 Department of Pediatric Neurology, Catholic University , Rome, Italy .
Francesco Muntoni9 Dubowitz Neuromuscular Center, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health , London, United Kingdom .
Bruno Sepodes10 Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa , Lisboa, Portugal .
Elizabeth Vroom11 United Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy , Amsterdam, the Netherlands .
Pavel Balabanov4 Central Nervous System and Ophthalmology, Scientific and Regulatory Management Department, Human Medicines Evaluation Division, European Medicines Agency , London, United Kingdom .
Centro Clinico Nemo · ITFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLMedicines Evaluation Board · NLNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severe, progressive muscle-wasting disease leading to disability and premature death. Patients lack the muscle membrane-stabilizing protein dystrophin. Antisense oligonucleotide (AON)-mediated exon skipping is a therapeutic approach that aims to induce production of partially functional dystrophins. Recently, an AON targeting exon 51 became the first of its class to be approved by the United States regulators [Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] for the treatment of DMD. A unique aspect of the exon-skipping approach for DMD is that, depending on the size and location of the mutation, different exons need to be skipped. This challenge raises a number of questions regarding the development and regulatory approval of those individual compounds. In this study, we present a perspective on those questions, following a European stakeholder meeting involving academics, regulators, and representatives from industry and patient organizations, and in the light of the most recent scientific and regulatory experience.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDystrophinExonsGenetic TherapyHumansMiceMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneMutationOligonucleotides, AntisenseStakeholder ParticipationUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDystrophinOligonucleotides, Antisenseexon skippingoligonucleotidesregulatory approval

Identifiers

PMID28796573
PMCPMC5649120
OpenAlexW2743090929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.