Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28796234›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2017

Electron microscopy using the genetically encoded APEX2 tag in cultured mammalian cells.

Jeffrey D Martell, Thomas J Deerinck, Stephanie S Lam, Mark H Ellisman, Alice Y Ting

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ITM2B Truncation Promotes Migrasome Formation to Accelerate Renal Cell Carcinoma Growth.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey D MartellDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas J DeerinckNational Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Stephanie S LamDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark H EllismanNational Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Alice Y TingDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USStanford University · US

Funding

IVEM and Image Analysis ResourceP41GM103412 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELLISMAN, MARK H · 2012 to 2019
$17.9M
New Probe and Methods for Correlated LM & EMR01GM086197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ADAMS, STEPHEN ROY, BOASSA, DANIELA · 2008 to 2020
$8.3M
Spatially-resolved proteomic mapping of living cellsR01CA186568 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TING, ALICE Y · 2013 to 2018
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186568NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103412NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy (EM) is the premiere technique for high-resolution imaging of cellular ultrastructure. Unambiguous identification of specific proteins or cellular compartments in electron micrographs, however, remains challenging because of difficulties in delivering electron-dense contrast agents to specific subcellular targets within intact cells. We recently reported enhanced ascorbate peroxidase 2 (APEX2) as a broadly applicable genetic tag that generates EM contrast on a specific protein or subcellular compartment of interest. This protocol provides guidelines for designing and validating APEX2 fusion constructs, along with detailed instructions for cell culture, transfection, fixation, heavy-metal staining, embedding in resin, and EM imaging. Although this protocol focuses on EM in cultured mammalian cells, APEX2 is applicable to many cell types and contexts, including intact tissues and organisms, and is useful for numerous applications beyond EM, including live-cell proteomic mapping. This protocol, which describes procedures for sample preparation from cell monolayers and cell pellets, can be completed in 10 d, including time for APEX2 fusion construct validation, cell growth, and solidification of embedding resins. Notably, the only additional steps required relative to a standard EM sample preparation are cell transfection and a 2- to 45-min staining period with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and hydrogen peroxide (H

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAnimalsAscorbate PeroxidasesCells, CulturedCellular StructuresChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsCytological TechniquesHEK293 CellsHippocampusHumansMicroscopy, ElectronMolecular ImagingRatsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAscorbate PeroxidasesRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28796234
PMCPMC5851282
OpenAlexW2742542317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.