Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28796213›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Global patterns of drought recovery.

Christopher R Schwalm, William R L Anderegg, Anna M Michalak, Joshua B Fisher, Franco Biondi, George Koch, Marcy Litvak, Kiona Ogle, John D Shaw, Adam Wolf and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R SchwalmWoods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts 02540, USA.
William R L AndereggDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Anna M MichalakDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Joshua B FisherJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA.
Franco BiondiDendroLab and Graduate Program of Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology (EECB), University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.
George KochCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA.
Marcy LitvakDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
Kiona OgleInformatics and Computing Program, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA.
John D ShawRocky Mountain Research Station, US Forest Service, Ogden, Utah 84401, USA.
Adam WolfArable Labs Inc., 40 North Tulane Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08542, USA.
Deborah N HuntzingerSchool of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA.
Kevin SchaeferNational Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.
Robert CookEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA.
Yaxing WeiEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA.
Yuanyuan FangDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Daniel HayesSchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA.
Maoyi HuangAtmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, USA.
Atul JainDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Hanqin TianInternational Center for Climate and Global Change Research and School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.
Northern Arizona University · USCarnegie Institution for Science · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USAuburn University · USJet Propulsion Laboratory · USNOAA National Ice Center · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USRocky Mountain Research Station · USTulane University · USUniversity of Illinois System · USUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Utah · USWoodwell Climate Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought, a recurring phenomenon with major impacts on both human and natural systems, is the most widespread climatic extreme that negatively affects the land carbon sink. Although twentieth-century trends in drought regimes are ambiguous, across many regions more frequent and severe droughts are expected in the twenty-first century. Recovery time-how long an ecosystem requires to revert to its pre-drought functional state-is a critical metric of drought impact. Yet the factors influencing drought recovery and its spatiotemporal patterns at the global scale are largely unknown. Here we analyse three independent datasets of gross primary productivity and show that, across diverse ecosystems, drought recovery times are strongly associated with climate and carbon cycle dynamics, with biodiversity and CO

Indexed as

EcosystemInternationalitySpatio-Temporal AnalysisBiodiversityCarbon DioxideCarbon SequestrationDroughtsGlobal WarmingHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyRainSoilTemperatureTime FactorsTropical ClimateWildfiresCarbon DioxideSoil

Identifiers

PMID28796213
OpenAlexW2486852991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.