ArticleNature2017
Palaeobiology: Ensure equal access to ancient DNA.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022Review
- Ethical considerations and publishing in human bioarcheology.American journal of biological anthropology · 2022Article
- Ancient Human Genomes and Environmental DNA from the Cement Attaching 2,000-Year-Old Head Lice Nits.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- A minimally destructive protocol for DNA extraction from ancient teeth.Genome research · 2021Article
- Human auditory ossicles as an alternative optimal source of ancient DNA.Genome research · 2020Article
- Not a limitless resource: ethics and guidelines for destructive sampling of archaeofaunal remains.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Opinion: To curate the molecular past, museums need a carefully considered set of best practices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- The problem with petrous? A consideration of the potential biases in the utilization ofWorld archaeology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28796208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.