ReviewAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017
Strategies for Supporting Physician-Scientists in Faculty Roles: A Narrative Review With Key Informant Consultations.
Review in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician-scientists' perspectives on key factors, emotions and feelings about selecting and attending continuous professional development events: a mixed-method study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Enhancing the physician-scientist workforce: evaluating a mentored research program for medical students' research competencies and intentions.Research square · 2024Article
- Exploring the motivation of health professionals to engage with research at various career stages.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Predictors of academic career progression among early career physician-scientists via an intensive research training program abroad: a case study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Research in orthopaedic trauma surgery: approaches of basic scientists and clinicians and the relevance of interprofessional research teams.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Review
- Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Rethinking Health Professionals' Motivation to Do Research: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Review
- Impact of a Respiratory Disease Young Investigators' Forum on the Career Development of Physician-Scientists.ATS scholar · 2020Article
- An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Cultivating Research Skills During Clinical Training to Promote Pediatric-Scientist Development.Pediatrics · 2019Article
- Article
- Preventing Translational Scientists From Extinction: The Long-Term Impact of a Personalized Training Program in Translational Medicine on the Careers of Translational Scientists.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
- Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Critical Care Clinician-Researchers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePhysician-scientists are a population in decline globally. Solutions to reverse this decline often have focused on the training pipeline. Less attention has been paid to reducing attrition post training, when physician-scientists take up faculty roles. However, this period is a known time of vulnerability because of the pressures of clinical duties and the long timeline to securing independent research funding. This narrative review explored existing knowledge regarding how best to support physician-scientists for success in their faculty roles.
methodThe authors searched the Medline, Embase, ERIC, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from 2000 to 2016 on this topic and interviewed key informants in 2015 to solicit their input on the review results.
resultsThe authors reviewed 78 articles and interviewed 16 key informants. From the literature, they developed a framework of organizational (facilitate mentorship, foster community, value the physician-scientist role, minimize financial barriers) and individual (develop professional and research skills) strategies for supporting physician-scientists. They also outlined key knowledge gaps representing topics either rarely or never addressed in the reviewed articles (percent research time, structural hypocrisy, objective assessment, group metrics, professional identity). The key informants confirmed the identified strategies and discussed how the gaps were particularly important and impactful.
conclusionsThis framework offers a basis for assessing an organization's existing support strategies, identifying outstanding needs, and developing targeted programming. The identified gaps require attention, as they threaten to undermine the benefits of existing support strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28795977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.