Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28795977›Full record

ReviewAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017

Strategies for Supporting Physician-Scientists in Faculty Roles: A Narrative Review With Key Informant Consultations.

Lorelei Lingard, Peter Zhang, Michael Strong, Margaret Steele, John Yoo, James Lewis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research in orthopaedic trauma surgery: approaches of basic scientists and clinicians and the relevance of interprofessional research teams.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorelei LingardL. Lingard is professor, Department of Medicine and Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. P. Zhang is a second-year medical student, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M. Strong is professor and dean, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. M. Steele is professor and dean, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. J. Yoo is professor and chair, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. J. Lewis is professor, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Peter Zhang
Michael Strong
Margaret Steele
John Yoo
James Lewis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysician-scientists are a population in decline globally. Solutions to reverse this decline often have focused on the training pipeline. Less attention has been paid to reducing attrition post training, when physician-scientists take up faculty roles. However, this period is a known time of vulnerability because of the pressures of clinical duties and the long timeline to securing independent research funding. This narrative review explored existing knowledge regarding how best to support physician-scientists for success in their faculty roles.

methodThe authors searched the Medline, Embase, ERIC, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from 2000 to 2016 on this topic and interviewed key informants in 2015 to solicit their input on the review results.

resultsThe authors reviewed 78 articles and interviewed 16 key informants. From the literature, they developed a framework of organizational (facilitate mentorship, foster community, value the physician-scientist role, minimize financial barriers) and individual (develop professional and research skills) strategies for supporting physician-scientists. They also outlined key knowledge gaps representing topics either rarely or never addressed in the reviewed articles (percent research time, structural hypocrisy, objective assessment, group metrics, professional identity). The key informants confirmed the identified strategies and discussed how the gaps were particularly important and impactful.

conclusionsThis framework offers a basis for assessing an organization's existing support strategies, identifying outstanding needs, and developing targeted programming. The identified gaps require attention, as they threaten to undermine the benefits of existing support strategies.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalHumansPersonnel ManagementPersonnel TurnoverPhysiciansResearch Personnel

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.