ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2018
Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up-scaling research to address ecological consequences.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular insights into the selective interaction of endocrine-disrupting chemicals with poly(mannuronate) in aqueous systems: a multiscale computational study.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) as a tool for conservation.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Review
- Review
- Effects of Pharmaceuticals and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Reproductive Biology of Aquatic Fauna: Penguins as Sentinel Species.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Article
- From prescription to pollution: The ecological consequences of NSAIDs in aquatic ecosystems.Toxicology reports · 2024Review
- Gonad pathology, sex hormone modulation and vitellogenin expression inFrontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Enhanced EDC removal from water through electron beam-mediated adsorber particle integration in microfiltration membranes.RSC advances · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Typical Environmental Endocrine Disruptors and Kidney Disease.Toxics · 2022Review
- Development of hybrid green nanocomposite polymeric beads doped with nano sulfated zirconia for effective removal of Cefotaxime antibiotic from aqueous solution.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Photocatalytic membranes: a new perspective for persistent organic pollutants removal.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Review
- The Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant System Response of the SeagrassInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Effects of Anthropic Pollutants Identified in Pampas Lakes on the Development and Reproduction of Pejerrey FishFrontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Toxicological effect and enzymatic disorder of non-studied emerging contaminants inToxicology reports · 2022Article
- Malathion-Induced Hematoxicity and Its Recovery Pattern inJournal of toxicology · 2021Article
- Bisphenols alter thermal responses and performance in zebrafish (Conservation physiology · 2021Article
- Steroid hormones and estrogenic activity in the wastewater outfall and receiving waters of the Chascomús chained shallow lakes system (Argentina).The Science of the total environment · 2020Article
- Divergent density feedback control of migratory predator recovery following sex-biased perturbations.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can alter biological function in organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and are a significant threat to aquatic biodiversity, but there is little understanding of exposure consequences for populations, communities and ecosystems. The pervasive nature of EDCs within aquatic environments and their multiple sub-lethal effects make assessments of their impact especially important but also highly challenging. Herein, we review the data on EDC effects in aquatic systems focusing on studies assessing populations and ecosystems, and including how biotic and abiotic processes may affect, and be affected by, responses to EDCs. Recent research indicates a significant influence of behavioural responses (e.g. enhancing feeding rates), transgenerational effects and trophic cascades in the ecological consequences of EDC exposure. In addition, interactions between EDCs and other chemical, physical and biological factors generate uncertainty in our understanding of the ecological effects of EDCs within aquatic ecosystems. We illustrate how effect thresholds for EDCs generated from individual-based experimental bioassays of the types commonly applied using chemical test guidelines [e.g. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)] may not necessarily reflect the hazards associated with endocrine disruption. We argue that improved risk assessment for EDCs in aquatic ecosystems urgently requires more ecologically oriented research as well as field-based assessments at population-, community- and food-web levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.