Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28795280›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2018

The use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an analysis of 5016 patients from 305 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan.

Yoichiro Tsukada, Takahiro Higashi, Hideaki Shimada, Yoshinori Kikuchi, Atsuro Terahara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yoichiro TsukadaDivision of Health Services Research, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. yotsukad@ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-0078
Takahiro HigashiDivision of Health Services Research, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hideaki ShimadaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinori KikuchiDivision of Gastorenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuro TeraharaDepartment of Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Toho University · JP

Funding

the National Cancer Center Research and Development Programs 28-A-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have shown the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of our study was to elucidate the use of neoadjuvant therapy for thoracic ESCC in Japan.

methodsData on patients with stage IB-III thoracic ESCC were retrieved from the national database of hospital-based cancer registries combined with claims data between 2012 and 2013. These data were analyzed using a mixed-effect logistic regression analysis, with a focus on exploring patterns in the first-line treatment for ESCC, including proportion of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, and investigating the hospital characteristics and patient factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

resultsOf the 5016 patients with stage IB-III thoracic ESCC at the 305 participating hospitals, 34.2% received neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 29.5%; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 4.7%). The therapy was less likely to be administered to older patients (≤64 years, 48.8%; 65-70 years, 42.0%; 70-75 years, 33.9%; 75-80 years, 22.2%; 80-85 years, 3.8%; ≥85 years, 1.4%) and at hospitals with a low volume of patients (very high, 42.1%; high, 37.5%; low, 30.7%; and very low, 26.4%). This trend was confirmed by regression analysis.

conclusionsBased on our results, in Japan, relatively few patients with resectable locally advanced thoracic ESCC receive neoadjuvant therapy, with older patients and patients at lower volume hospitals being less likely than other patients to receive the neoadjuvant therapy. We recommend that the process of treatment decision-making be assessed at both the patient and hospital levels so that patients can consider various treatment options, including neoadjuvant therapy with surgery in Japan.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCancer Care FacilitiesCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansJapanLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyAgeEsophageal cancerHealthcare inequalitiesHospital volumePractice patternsRegistries

Identifiers

PMID28795280
OpenAlexW2743128651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.