Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28795236›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2017

A novel continuous inhibitory-control task: variation in individual performance by young pheasants (Phasianus colchicus).

Christina Meier, Sara Raj Pant, Jayden O van Horik, Philippa R Laker, Ellis J G Langley, Mark A Whiteside, Frederick Verbruggen, Joah R Madden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Heritability and correlations among learning and inhibitory control traits.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina MeierSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Sara Raj PantSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Jayden O van HorikSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Philippa R LakerSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Ellis J G LangleySchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Mark A WhitesideSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Frederick VerbruggenSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Joah R MaddenSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. J.R.Madden@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-0967

Funding

European Research Council 312445European Research Council 616474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory control enables subjects to quickly react to unexpectedly changing external demands. We assessed the ability of young (8 weeks old) pheasants Phasianus colchicus to exert inhibitory control in a novel response-inhibition task that required subjects to adjust their movement in space in pursuit of a reward across changing target locations. The difference in latencies between trials in which the target location did and did not change, the distance travelled towards the initially indicated location after a change occurred, and the change-signal reaction time provided a consistent measure that could be indicative of a pheasant's inhibitory control. Between individuals, there was a great variability in these measures; these differences were not correlated with motivation either to access the reward or participate in the test. However, individuals that were slower to reach rewards in trials when the target did not change exhibited evidence of stronger inhibitory control, as did males and small individuals. This novel test paradigm offers a potential assay of inhibitory control that utilises a natural feature of an animal's behavioural repertoire, likely common to a wide range of species, specifically their ability to rapidly alter their trajectory when reward locations switch.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCognitionFemaleGalliformesIndividualityMaleMotivationSex FactorsA-not-B taskDetour-reach taskInhibitory controlPhasianus colchicusPheasantStop-signal task

Identifiers

PMID28795236
PMCPMC5640750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.