Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28795202›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2017

Predicting genomic selection efficiency to optimize calibration set and to assess prediction accuracy in highly structured populations.

R Rincent, A Charcosset, L Moreau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Unveiling the interactions between design optimization, modeling strategies, and spatial analysis in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrating genomic predictions into an applied Central European wheat breeding program.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Constructing training sets for genomic selection to identify superior genotypes in candidate populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sample size determination for training set optimization in genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  18. A comparison of methods for training population optimization in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R RincentINRA, UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France. renaud.rincent@inra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-0969
A CharcossetUMR de Génétique Végétale, INRA - Université Paris-Sud - CNRS, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
L MoreauUMR de Génétique Végétale, INRA - Université Paris-Sud - CNRS, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe propose a criterion to predict genomic selection efficiency for structured populations. This criterion is useful to define optimal calibration set and to estimate prediction reliability for multiparental populations. Genomic selection refers to the use of genotypic information for predicting the performance of selection candidates. It has been shown that prediction accuracy depends on various parameters including the composition of the calibration set (CS). Assessing the level of accuracy of a given prediction scenario is of highest importance because it can be used to optimize CS sampling before collecting phenotypes, and once the breeding values are predicted it informs the breeders about the reliability of these predictions. Different criteria were proposed to optimize CS sampling in highly diverse panels, which can be useful to screen collections of genotypes. But plant breeders often work on structured material such as biparental or multiparental populations, for which these criteria are less adapted. We derived from the generalized coefficient of determination (CD) theory different criteria to optimize CS sampling and to assess the reliability associated to predictions in structured populations. These criteria were evaluated on two nested association mapping (NAM) populations and two highly diverse panels of maize. They were efficient to sample optimized CS in most situations. They could also estimate at least partly the reliability associated to predictions between NAM families, but they could not estimate differences in the reliability associated to the predictions of NAM families using the highly diverse panels as calibration sets. We illustrated that the CD criteria could be adapted to various prediction scenarios including inter and intra-family predictions, resulting in higher prediction accuracies.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticCalibrationGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsZea mays

Identifiers

PMID28795202
PMCPMC5641287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.