ArticleJournal of pediatric genetics2017
Article in Journal of pediatric genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinoic Acid-Induced 1 Gene and Neuropsychiatric Diseases: A Systematic Review.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A unique Smith-Magenis patient with a de novo intragenic deletion on the maternally inherited overexpressed RAI1 allele.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Review
- Objective measures of sleep disturbances in children with Potocki-Lupski syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2019Article
- Smith-Magenis Syndrome: Molecular Basis of a Genetic-Driven Melatonin Circadian Secretion Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Behavior and sleep disturbance in Smith-Magenis syndrome.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2019Review
- The behavioural phenotype of Potocki-Lupski syndrome: a cross-syndrome comparison.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.