Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794852›Full record

ArticleClinical sarcoma research2017

Radiation induced angiosarcoma of the breast: outcomes from a retrospective case series.

R B Cohen-Hallaleh, H G Smith, R C Smith, G F Stamp, O Al-Muderis, K Thway, A Miah, K Khabra, I Judson, R Jones and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical sarcoma research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Recurrent radiogenic angiosarcoma of the breast: a rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R B Cohen-HallalehThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
H G SmithThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R C SmithThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
G F StampThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
O Al-MuderisThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
K ThwayThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A MiahThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
K KhabraThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
I JudsonThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R JonesThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
C BensonThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A J HayesThe Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Royal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation induced angiosarcoma (RIAS) of the breast is a rare and aggressive complication of radiotherapy. Due to the rarity of this disease, much of the evidence for its management is based on case reports or small retrospective series. We sought to describe the management and outcomes of RIAS in a large single-institution series.

methodsAll patients diagnosed with RIAS between January 2000 and January 2014 were identified from an institutional database.

resultsA total of 49 patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range 51-93). Median time from completion of radiotherapy to diagnosis of RIAS was 7.5 years. Median tumour size at presentation was 5.0 cm (1.5-19.0). The majority of patients presented with localised disease (47, 95.9%). Of these, 35 (74.5%) were suitable for surgery and underwent surgery with curative intent. Twelve patients presented with localised irresectable disease. Of these, 7 received systemic chemotherapy, with a sufficient response to facilitate surgery in 3 patients. Following potentially curative surgery, 2-year local recurrence-free was 55.2%. Survival was significantly prolonged in patients presenting with resectable disease (2-year overall survival 71.1% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001). Tumour size >5 cm was prognostic of distant metastases-free survival and overall survival.

conclusionRIAS are rare, aggressive soft-tissue lesions with limited treatment options and high-rates of both local and systemic relapse.

Indexed as

AngiosarcomaBreastRadiation

Identifiers

PMID28794852
PMCPMC5547463
OpenAlexW2743600719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.