Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794248›Full record

Observational studyNeurology2017

Anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatment and short-term disability progression in SPMS.

Johannes Lorscheider, Vilija G Jokubaitis, Tim Spelman, Guillermo Izquierdo, Alessandra Lugaresi, Eva Havrdova, Dana Horakova, Maria Trojano, Pierre Duquette, Marc Girard and 19 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Recurrent disability progression endpoints in multiple sclerosis clinical trials.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Johannes Lorscheider
Vilija G Jokubaitis
Tim Spelman
Guillermo Izquierdo
Alessandra Lugaresi
Eva Havrdova
Dana Horakova
Maria Trojano
Pierre Duquette
Marc Girard
Alexandre Prat
François Grand'Maison
Pierre Grammond
Eugenio Pucci
Cavit Boz
Patrizia Sola
Diana Ferraro
Daniele Spitaleri
Jeanette Lechner-Scott
Murat Terzi
Vincent Van Pesch
Gerardo Iuliano
Roberto Bergamaschi
Cristina Ramo-Tello
Franco Granella
Celia Oreja-Guevara
Helmut Butzkueven
Tomas Kalincik
MSBase Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of disease-modifying treatment on short-term disability outcomes in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).

methodsUsing MSBase, an international cohort study, we previously validated a highly accurate definition of SPMS. Here, we identified patients in MSBase who were either untreated or treated with a disease-modifying drug when meeting this definition. Propensity score matching was used to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses adjusted for treatment persistence, visit density, and relapse rates.

resultsOf the 2,381 included patients, 1,378 patients were matchable (treated n = 689, untreated n = 689). Median pairwise-censored follow-up was 2.1 years (quartiles 1.2-3.8 years). No difference in the risk of 6-month sustained disability progression was observed between the groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-1.1,

conclusionsOur pooled analysis of the currently available disease-modifying agents used after conversion to SPMS suggests that, on average, these therapies have no substantial effect on relapse-unrelated disability outcomes measured by the EDSS up to 4 years. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with SPMS, disease-modifying treatment has no beneficial effect on short-term disability progression.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsArea Under CurveDisability EvaluationDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressivePropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRecurrenceAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID28794248
PMCPMC5589791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.