Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794219›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Dodging silver bullets: good CRISPR gene-drive design is critical for eradicating exotic vertebrates.

Thomas A A Prowse, Phillip Cassey, Joshua V Ross, Chandran Pfitzner, Talia A Wittmann, Paul Thomas

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Y-linked editors for invasive rodent control.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Generation of Gene Drive Mice for Invasive Pest Population Suppression.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas A A ProwseSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia thomas.prowse@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-767X
Phillip CasseyThe Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Joshua V RossSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Chandran PfitznerThe Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Talia A WittmannThe Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Paul ThomasThe Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-replicating gene drives that can spread deleterious alleles through animal populations have been promoted as a much needed but controversial 'silver bullet' for controlling invasive alien species. Homing-based drives comprise an endonuclease and a guide RNA (gRNA) that are replicated during meiosis via homologous recombination. However, their efficacy for controlling wild populations is threatened by inherent polymorphic resistance and the creation of resistance alleles via non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ)-mediated DNA repair. We used stochastic individual-based models to identify realistic gene-drive strategies capable of eradicating vertebrate pest populations (mice, rats and rabbits) on islands. One popular strategy, a sex-reversing drive that converts heterozygous females into sterile males, failed to spread and required the ongoing deployment of gene-drive carriers to achieve eradication. Under alternative strategies, multiplexed gRNAs could overcome inherent polymorphic resistance and were required for eradication success even when the probability of NHEJ was low. Strategies causing homozygotic embryonic non-viability or homozygotic female sterility produced high probabilities of eradication and were robust to NHEJ-mediated deletion of the DNA sequence between multiplexed endonuclease recognition sites. The latter two strategies also purged the gene drive when eradication failed, therefore posing lower long-term risk should animals escape beyond target islands. Multiplexing gRNAs will be necessary if this technology is to be useful for insular extirpation attempts; however, precise knowledge of homing rates will be required to design low-risk gene drives with high probabilities of eradication success.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsFemaleIslandsMaleMicePest ControlRabbitsRatsgene drivehomingisland conservationnon-homologous end joiningpopulation eradicationresistance allele

Identifiers

PMID28794219
PMCPMC5563802
OpenAlexW2742458246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.