Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794216›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise.

Sue Anne Zollinger, Peter J B Slater, Erwin Nemeth, Henrik Brumm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The impact of urbanisation on social behaviour: a comprehensive review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multiple constraints on urban bird communication: both abiotic and biotic noise shape songs in cities.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  14. Experience modulates an insect's response to anthropogenic noise.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sue Anne ZollingerCommunication and Social Behaviour Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany zollinger@orn.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8819-2606
Peter J B SlaterSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK.
Erwin NemethCommunication and Social Behaviour Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.
Henrik BrummCommunication and Social Behaviour Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-9357

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E003494/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been observed in many songbird species that populations in noisy urban areas sing with a higher minimum frequency than do matched populations in quieter, less developed areas. However, why and how this divergence occurs is not yet understood. We experimentally tested whether chronic noise exposure during vocal learning results in songs with higher minimum frequencies in great tits (

Indexed as

CitiesNoiseVocalization, AnimalAnimalsSongbirdsanimal communicationanthropogenic noisebird songurbanizationvocal plasticity

Identifiers

PMID28794216
PMCPMC5563796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.