Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794215›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in

Sally Le Page, Irem Sepil, Ewan Flintham, Tommaso Pizzari, Pau Carazo, Stuart Wigby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Ageing effects of social environments in 'non-social' insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Short-term increases in rival number improves single mating productivity in maleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sally Le PageEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK sally.lepage@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-1344
Irem SepilEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ewan FlinthamEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tommaso PizzariEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pau CarazoBehaviour, Ecology and Evolution group, Instituto Cavanilles of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1525-6522
Stuart WigbyEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-2948

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K014544/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males compete over mating and fertilization, and often harm females in the process. Inclusive fitness theory predicts that increasing relatedness within groups of males may relax competition and discourage male harm of females as males gain indirect benefits. Recent studies in

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterFemaleMaleReproductionDrosophilainclusive fitnesskin selectionsexual conflictsexual selectionsocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID28794215
PMCPMC5563793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.