Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794198›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

The absence or temporal offset of visual feedback does not influence adaptation to novel movement dynamics.

Erin McKenna, Laurence C Jayet Bray, Weiwei Zhou, Wilsaan M Joiner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive interception across speed profiles.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin McKennaProgram in Neuroscience, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Laurence C Jayet BraySensorimotor Integration Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia; and.
Weiwei ZhouSensorimotor Integration Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia; and.
Wilsaan M JoinerProgram in Neuroscience, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia; wjoiner2@gmu.edu.
George Mason University · USInstitute for Advanced Study · US

Funding

ROLE OF THE SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENT COROLLARY DISCHARGE IN STABLE VISUAL PERCEPTIONR00EY021252 · NEI · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI JOINER, WILSAAN M · 2012 to 2014
$715k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY021252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delays in transmitting and processing sensory information require correctly associating delayed feedback to issued motor commands for accurate error compensation. The flexibility of this alignment between motor signals and feedback has been demonstrated for movement recalibration to visual manipulations, but the alignment dependence for adapting movement dynamics is largely unknown. Here we examined the effect of visual feedback manipulations on force-field adaptation. Three subject groups used a manipulandum while experiencing a lag in the corresponding cursor motion (0, 75, or 150 ms). When the offset was applied at the start of the session (continuous condition), adaptation was not significantly different between groups. However, these similarities may be due to acclimation to the offset before motor adaptation. We tested additional subjects who experienced the same delays concurrent with the introduction of the perturbation (abrupt condition). In this case adaptation was statistically indistinguishable from the continuous condition, indicating that acclimation to feedback delay was not a factor. In addition, end-point errors were not significantly different across the delay or onset conditions, but end-point correction (e.g., deceleration duration) was influenced by the temporal offset. As an additional control, we tested a group of subjects who performed without visual feedback and found comparable movement adaptation results. These results suggest that visual feedback manipulation (absence or temporal misalignment) does not affect adaptation to novel dynamics, independent of both acclimation and perceptual awareness. These findings could have implications for modeling how the motor system adjusts to errors despite concurrent delays in sensory feedback information.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalMovementVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHandHumansMaleReaction Timeacclimationmotor adaptationprediction errorsensory feedbackvision

Identifiers

PMID28794198
PMCPMC5646192
OpenAlexW2744924134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.