Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28794161›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

How pigeons couple three-dimensional elbow and wrist motion to morph their wings.

Amanda K Stowers, Laura Y Matloff, David Lentink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The spatiotemporal richness of hummingbird wing deformations.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Guide to Inverse Kinematic Marker-Guided Rotoscoping Using IK Solvers.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  11. Raptor wing morphing with flight speed.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda K StowersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 416 Escondido Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA astowers@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-9524
Laura Y MatloffDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 416 Escondido Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2033-2243
David LentinkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 416 Escondido Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA dlentink@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-6815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds change the shape and area of their wings to an exceptional degree, surpassing insects, bats and aircraft in their ability to morph their wings for a variety of tasks. This morphing is governed by a musculoskeletal system, which couples elbow and wrist motion. Since the discovery of this effect in 1839, the planar 'drawing parallels' mechanism has been used to explain the coupling. Remarkably, this mechanism has never been corroborated from quantitative motion data. Therefore, we measured how the wing skeleton of a pigeon (

Indexed as

ColumbidaeForelimbWings, AnimalAnimalsFlight, AnimalJointsMovementaviandesignfunctional morphologyskeletal mechanismwing morphing

Identifiers

PMID28794161
PMCPMC5582118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.