ArticleJournal of virology2017
The Loop Formed by Residues 340 to 343 of Reovirus μ1 Controls Entry-Related Conformational Changes.
Article in Journal of virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mammalian orthoreovirus capsid protein σ3 antagonizes RLR-mediated antiviral responses by degrading MAVS.mSphere · 2024Article
- The Reovirus σ1 Attachment Protein Influences the Stability of Its Entry Intermediate.Journal of virology · 2023Article
- Control of Capsid Transformations during Reovirus Entry.Viruses · 2021Review
- Article
- Protein Mismatches Caused by Reassortment Influence Functions of the Reovirus Capsid.Journal of virology · 2018Article
- N-Terminal Myristoylated VP5 is Required for Penetrating Cell Membrane and Promoting Infectivity in Aquareoviruses.Virologica Sinica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reovirus particles are covered with 200 μ1/σ3 heterohexamers. Following attachment to cell surface receptors, reovirus is internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Within the endosome, particles undergo a series of stepwise disassembly events. First, the σ3 protector protein is degraded by cellular proteases to generate infectious subviral particles (ISVPs). Second, the μ1 protein rearranges into a protease-sensitive conformation to generate ISVP*s and releases two virus-encoded peptides, μ1N and Φ. The released peptides promote delivery of the genome-containing core by perforating the endosomal membrane. Thus, to establish a productive infection, virions must be stable in the environment but flexible to disassemble in response to the appropriate cellular cue. The reovirus outer capsid is stabilized by μ1 intratrimer, intertrimer, and trimer-core interactions. As a consequence of ISVP-to-ISVP* conversion, neighboring μ1 trimers unwind and separate. Located within the μ1 jelly roll β barrel domain, which is a known regulator of ISVP* formation, residues 340 to 343 form a loop and have been proposed to facilitate viral entry. To test this idea, we generated recombinant reoviruses that encoded deletions within this loop (Δ341 and Δ342). Both deletions destabilized the outer capsid. Notably, Δ342 impaired the viral life cycle; however, replicative fitness was restored by an additional change (V403A) within the μ1 jelly roll β barrel domain. In the Δ341 and Δ342 backgrounds, V403A also rescued defects in ISVP-to-ISVP* conversion. Together, these findings reveal a new region that regulates reovirus disassembly and how perturbing a metastable capsid can compromise replicative fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.