Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28793991›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2017

Trial of ready-to-use supplemental food and corn-soy blend in pregnant Malawian women with moderate malnutrition: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Meghan Callaghan-Gillespie, Andrew A Schaffner, Patsy Garcia, Jocelyn Fry, Rachael Eckert, Shirin Malek, Indi Trehan, Chrissie Thakwalakwa, Kenneth M Maleta, Mark J Manary and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02120599 (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Impact of Treating Moderately Malnourished Women in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02120599 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Impact of Treating Moderately Malnourished Women in Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2014 to 2016Enrolled1,867ConditionsPregnancy, Moderate MalnutritionArmsready-to-use supplementary food, corn-soy blend, iron, folic acid, UNIMMAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meghan Callaghan-GillespieDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Andrew A SchaffnerDepartment of Statistics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Patsy GarciaDepartment of Statistics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Jocelyn FryDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Rachael EckertDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Shirin MalekDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Indi TrehanDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Chrissie ThakwalakwaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Kenneth M MaletaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mark J ManaryDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Peggy C PapathakisDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.

Funding

Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Brian N Finck · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with poor birth outcomes. Objective: This study compared maternal and offspring anthropometry for moderately malnourished pregnant women receiving ready-to-use supplemental food (RUSF), a fortified corn-soy blend (CSB+) with a daily multiple micronutrient antenatal supplement [United Nations International Multiple Micronutrient Preparation (UNIMMAP)], or standard of care comprising CSB+ and iron and folic acid (IFA). Design: A single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in southern Malawi among 1828 pregnant women with moderate malnutrition, defined as a midupper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥20.6 and ≤23.0 cm. Women received 1 of 3 dietary treatment regimens that provided ∼900 kcal/d and 33-36 g protein/d. Maternal and infant anthropometry were followed until the child was 3 mo old. Results: Newborns had a mean length-for-age z score of -1.3 ± 1.2 and 22% were stunted at birth. Mothers receiving RUSF had the highest weight gain during supplementation (3.4 ± 2.6, 3.0 ± 2.2, and 3.2 ± 2.4 kg for the RUSF, CSB+ with UNIMMAP, and CSB+ with IFA groups, respectively; P = 0.03). Newborn birth weights and lengths were similar across intervention groups, but the incidence of newborns with a birth weight <2.4 kg (weight-for-age z score <-2) was higher in the CSB+ with UNIMMAP group than the other groups (17%, 18%, and 24% for the CSB+ with IFA, RUSF, and CSB+ with UNIMMAP groups, respectively; P = 0.02). At birth, HIV-exposed newborns had a similar length and weight as newborns without HIV exposure, but their head circumference was smaller (34.0 ± 1.5 and 34.3 ± 1.6 cm, respectively; P = 0.02). At 3 mo of age, HIV-exposed infants had smaller weights, lengths, and head and arm circumferences than infants without HIV exposure. Conclusions: RUSF improved maternal weight gain compared with CSB+ with UNIMMAP. The large amount of food given and the modest effect on linear growth in newborns suggests that stunting in utero is unlikely to be reduced by supplemental food alone. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02120599.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedAdultBirth WeightFemaleGlycine maxHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalnutritionPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSingle-Blind MethodZea mays

Identifiers

PMID28793991
PMCPMC6483045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.