ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2017
Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer's and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation?
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phonological and Semantic Fluency in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring the Relationship Between Deficits in Social Cognition and Neurodegenerative Dementia: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Discriminating behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease via the Frontal Assessment Battery.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the correspondence of neuropsychological profiles with clinical diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease: insights fromFrontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Classification of AD and bvFTD using neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric variables: a machine learning study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Fourteen years later: Reviewing the diagnostic criteria for behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Comparing clinical features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using network analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Neuropsychological tests at the Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementias: results from a survey on 450 specialized services.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Article
- Detecting Alzheimer's Disease Stages and Frontotemporal Dementia in Time Courses of Resting-State fMRI Data Using a Machine Learning Approach.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Differential Diagnostics Potential of Uniform Data Set 2 Neuropsychology Battery Using Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024Article
- Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment Status: Pilot Study of Machine Learning Models Based on Longitudinal Data From Fitness Trackers.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- A systematic review of cognitive and behavioral tools to differentiate behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from other conditions.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Review
- Assessing processing speed and its neural correlates in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia with a non-verbal tablet-based task.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- The effect of aperiodic components in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Automated free speech analysis reveals distinct markers of Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia.PloS one · 2024Article
- Combining Neuropsychological Assessment with Neuroimaging to Distinguish Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease from Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration in Non-Western Tonal Native Language-Speaking Individuals Living in Taiwan: A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- FDG-PET-based neural correlates of Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III scores in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal degeneration.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2022Article
- Article
- Good Performance of the Chinese Version of Mini Social Cognition and Emotional Assessment in the Early Diagnosis of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuropsychological testing is considered crucial for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). In-depth neuropsychological assessment revealed specific dysfunctions in the two dementia syndromes. However, a significant overlap of cognitive impairments exists in early disease stages. We questioned whether a standard neuropsychological assessment at initial clinical presentation can delineate patients with AD versus bvFTD.
methodsIn a retrospective approach, we evaluated and compared how cognitive profiles assessed at initial clinical presentation predicted the diagnosis of later verified AD (n = 43) and bvFTD (n = 26). Additionally, the neuropsychological standard domains memory, language, visuospatial skills, executive functions, praxis and social cognition were subjected to stepwise discriminant analysis to compare their differential contribution to diagnosis.
resultsRegardless of diagnosis, a percentage of patients presented with major deterioration in a wide range of cognitive domains when compared with age-matched normative data. Only few significant differences were detected on the group level: Patients with AD were relatively more impaired in the verbal recall, verbal recognition, figure copy, and surprisingly in the executive subdomains, set shifting and processing speed whereas bvFTD was characterised by more deficits in imitation of face postures. A combination of tests for verbal recall, imitation of limb and face postures, and figure copy showed the greatest discriminatory power.
conclusionsOur results imply that the contribution of a standard neuropsychological assessment is limited for differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD at initial presentation. In contrast to current clinical guidelines, executive functions are neither particularly nor exclusively impaired in patients with bvFTD when assessed within a standard clinical neuropsychological test battery. The significant overlap of bvFTD and AD concerning the profile of cognitive impairments questions current neuropsychological diagnostic criteria and calls for revision, regarding both the degree and the profile of cognitive deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.