Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28793888›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Does structural leg-length discrepancy affect postural control? Preliminary study.

Małgorzata Eliks, Wioleta Ostiak-Tomaszewska, Przemysław Lisiński, Paweł Koczewski

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03048656 (Does the Structural Leg-length Discrepancy Affect the Postural Control? Preliminary Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03048656 nacompletednot on this map

Does the Structural Leg-length Discrepancy Affect the Postural Control? Preliminary Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Medical SciencesRan2017 to 2017Enrolled38ConditionsLeg Length InequalityArmsstatic posturography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of Leg Length Discrepancy on Dynamic Gait Stability.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Małgorzata EliksDepartment of Health Prophylaxis, Laboratory of Medical Electrodiagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Heliodor Swiecicki Clinical Hospital, 49 Przybyszewskiego St., 60-101, Poznań, Poland. malgorzata.eliks@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-0887
Wioleta Ostiak-TomaszewskaDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Wiktor Dega Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital, 135/147 28 Czerwca 1956 r. St., 61-545, Poznań, Poland.
Przemysław LisińskiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Wiktor Dega Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital, 135/147 28 Czerwca 1956 r. St., 61-545, Poznań, Poland.
Paweł KoczewskiDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Wiktor Dega Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital, 135/147 28 Czerwca 1956 r. St., 61-545, Poznań, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeg-length inequality results in an altered position of the spine and pelvis. Previous studies on the influence of leg asymmetry on postural control have been inconclusive. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the effect of structural leg-length discrepancy (LLD) on the control of posture.

methodsWe studied 38 individuals (19 patients with structural LLD, 19 healthy subjects). The examination included measurement of the length of the lower limbs and weight distribution as well as a static posturography. All statistical analyses were performed with Statistica software version 10.0. Non-parametrical Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post test and Spearman test were used. Differences between the groups and correlation between mean COP sway velocity and the value of LLD as well as the value of LLD and weight distribution were assumed as statistically significant at p < 0.05.

resultsThere was a significant difference in the asymmetry of weight distribution between the group of patients and the healthy subjects (p = 0.0005). Differences in a posturographic examination between the groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Meaningful differences in mean COP velocity in mediolateral direction between tandem stance with eyes open and closed were detected in both groups (in controls p = 0.000134, in patients both with the shorter leg in a front and rear position, p = 0.029, p = 0.026 respectively). There was a positive moderate correlation between the value of LLD and the value of mean COP velocity in normal standing in mediolateral direction with eyes open (r = 0.47) and closed (r = 0.54) and in anterioposterior plane with eyes closed (r = 0.05).

conclusionsThe fact that there were no significant differences in posturography between the groups might indicate compensations to the altered posture and neuromuscular adaptations in patients with structural leg-length inequality. LLD causes an increased asymmetry of weight distribution. This study confirmed a fundamental role of the sight in postural control, especially in unstable conditions. The analysis of mean COP sway velocity may suggest a proportional deterioration of postural control with the increase of the value of leg-length asymmetry. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03048656 , 8 February 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansLeg Length InequalityMalePilot ProjectsPostural BalancePostureWeight-BearingYoung AdultLeg-length inequalityPostural balancePostural controlWeight bearingWeight distribution

Identifiers

PMID28793888
PMCPMC5551003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.