ArticleBMC genomics2017
Genome-based exploration of the specialized metabolic capacities of the genus Rhodococcus.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Guided Discovery of an Antimicrobial Peptide Scaffold from an Undescribed AntarcticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rhodococcus folensis sp. nov., an orange-red-pigmented bacterium from mining soil.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BiG-SCAPE 2.0 and BiG-SLiCE 2.0: scalable, accurate and interactive sequence clustering of metabolic gene clusters.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Characterization of a quorum-sensing communication based on gamma-butyrolactones inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Rhodopyran, a carboxylated hexahydrocyclopenta[Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2026Article
- Assessing the effect of temperature onMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025Article
- A Marine-Derived Steroid fromMarine drugs · 2025Article
- Defining the cultured and uncultured bacterial fractions in Cannabis seeds.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the biosynthesis potential of permafrost microbiomes.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Article
- Volatile communication in Actinobacteria: a language for secondary metabolism regulation.Microbial cell factories · 2024Article
- Biosynthetic potential of the sediment microbial subcommunities of an unexplored karst ecosystem and its ecological implications.MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Article
- Exploring the biosynthetic gene clusters in Brevibacterium: a comparative genomic analysis of diversity and distribution.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Isolation and Characterization of the Wastewater Micropollutant Phenacetin-Degrading BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- GenoVi, an open-source automated circular genome visualizer for bacteria and archaea.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Expanding the genomic encyclopedia ofCell genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Effects of Light on Growth and Metabolism ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Identification of a Novel Biosurfactant with Antimicrobial Activity Produced byMicroorganisms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacteria of the genus Rhodococcus are well known for their ability to degrade a large range of organic compounds. Some rhodococci are free-living, saprophytic bacteria; others are animal and plant pathogens. Recently, several studies have shown that their genomes encode putative pathways for the synthesis of a large number of specialized metabolites that are likely to be involved in microbe-microbe and host-microbe interactions. To systematically explore the specialized metabolic potential of this genus, we here performed a comprehensive analysis of the biosynthetic coding capacity across publicly available rhododoccal genomes, and compared these with those of several Mycobacterium strains as well as that of their mutual close relative Amycolicicoccus subflavus.
resultsComparative genomic analysis shows that most predicted biosynthetic gene cluster families in these strains are clade-specific and lack any homology with gene clusters encoding the production of known natural products. Interestingly, many of these clusters appear to encode the biosynthesis of lipopeptides, which may play key roles in the diverse environments were rhodococci thrive, by acting as biosurfactants, pathogenicity factors or antimicrobials. We also identified several gene cluster families that are universally shared among all three genera, which therefore may have a more 'primary' role in their physiology. Inactivation of these clusters by mutagenesis might help to generate weaker strains that can be used as live vaccines.
conclusionsThe genus Rhodococcus thus provides an interesting target for natural product discovery, in view of its large and mostly uncharacterized biosynthetic repertoire, its relatively fast growth and the availability of effective genetic tools for its genomic modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.