Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28793794›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2017

Excitable Signal Transduction Networks in Directed Cell Migration.

Peter N Devreotes, Sayak Bhattacharya, Marc Edwards, Pablo A Iglesias, Thomas Lampert, Yuchuan Miao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Single-cell chiral symmetry breaking under confinement.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Computational models in directed cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Signaling and actin waves at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter N DevreotesDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; email: pnd@jhmi.edu.
Sayak BhattacharyaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.
Marc EdwardsDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; email: pnd@jhmi.edu.
Pablo A IglesiasDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; email: pnd@jhmi.edu.
Thomas LampertDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; email: pnd@jhmi.edu.
Yuchuan MiaoDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; email: pnd@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Excitable Networks in Directed Cell MigrationR35GM118177 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Peter N Devreotes · 2016 to 2026
$12.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although directed migration of eukaryotic cells may have evolved to escape nutrient depletion, it has been adopted for an extensive range of physiological events during development and in the adult organism. The subversion of these movements results in disease, such as cancer. Mechanisms of propulsion and sensing are extremely diverse, but most eukaryotic cells move by extending actin-filled protrusions termed macropinosomes, pseudopodia, or lamellipodia or by extension of blebs. In addition to motility, directed migration involves polarity and directional sensing. The hundreds of gene products involved in these processes are organized into networks of parallel and interconnected pathways. Many of these components are activated or inhibited coordinately with stimulation and on each spontaneously extended protrusion. Moreover, these networks display hallmarks of excitability, including all-or-nothing responsiveness and wave propagation. Cellular protrusions result from signal transduction waves that propagate outwardly from an origin and drive cytoskeletal activity. The range of the propagating waves and hence the size of the protrusions can be altered by lowering or raising the threshold for network activation, with larger and wider protrusions favoring gliding or oscillatory behavior over amoeboid migration. Here, we evaluate the variety of models of excitable networks controlling directed migration and outline critical tests. We also discuss the utility of this emerging view in producing cell migration and in integrating the various extrinsic cues that direct migration.

Indexed as

Cell MovementSignal TransductionAnimalsHumansModels, Biologicalbiochemical oscillationschemotaxiselectrotaxisinflammationmetastasisshear stress

Identifiers

PMID28793794
PMCPMC5792054
OpenAlexW2613093517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.