Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28793533›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Biodegradable Materials for Bone Repair and Tissue Engineering Applications.

Zeeshan Sheikh, Shariq Najeeb, Zohaib Khurshid, Vivek Verma, Haroon Rashid, Michael Glogauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analyses on animal models used in bone adhesive research.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Application and prospects of nanomaterials in osteoporosis treatment.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Biomimetic Scaffold of Chitosan fromAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zeeshan SheikhFaculty of Dentistry, Matrix Dynamics Group, University of Toronto, 150 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada. zeeshan.sheikh@utoronto.ca.
Shariq NajeebSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. shariqnajeeb@gmail.com.
Zohaib KhurshidSchool of Materials and Metallurgy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. drzohaibkhurshid@gmail.com.
Vivek VermaFaculty of Dentistry, Division of Biomedical Sciences, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada. vivek.verma@mail.mcgill.ca.
Haroon RashidCollege of Dentistry, Division of Prosthodontics, Ziauddin University, 4/B, Clifton, Karachi 7550, Pakistan. drh.rashid@hotmail.com.
Michael GlogauerMatrix Dynamics Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 150 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada. Michael.Glogauer@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses and summarizes the recent developments and advances in the use of biodegradable materials for bone repair purposes. The choice between using degradable and non-degradable devices for orthopedic and maxillofacial applications must be carefully weighed. Traditional biodegradable devices for osteosynthesis have been successful in low or mild load bearing applications. However, continuing research and recent developments in the field of material science has resulted in development of biomaterials with improved strength and mechanical properties. For this purpose, biodegradable materials, including polymers, ceramics and magnesium alloys have attracted much attention for osteologic repair and applications. The next generation of biodegradable materials would benefit from recent knowledge gained regarding cell material interactions, with better control of interfacing between the material and the surrounding bone tissue. The next generations of biodegradable materials for bone repair and regeneration applications require better control of interfacing between the material and the surrounding bone tissue. Also, the mechanical properties and degradation/resorption profiles of these materials require further improvement to broaden their use and achieve better clinical results.

Indexed as

biodegradable materialsbiomaterialsbone regenerationbone repairtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28793533
PMCPMC5512653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.