Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28793519›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Influence of Different Three-Dimensional Open Porous Titanium Scaffold Designs on Human Osteoblasts Behavior in Static and Dynamic Cell Investigations.

Jana Markhoff, Jan Wieding, Volker Weissmann, Juliane Pasold, Anika Jonitz-Heincke, Rainer Bader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Porous metal implants: processing, properties, and challenges.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jana MarkhoffUniversity Medicine Rostock, Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Laboratory, Doberaner Strasse 142, Rostock 18057, Germany. jana.markhoff@med.uni-rostock.de.
Jan WiedingUniversity Medicine Rostock, Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Laboratory, Doberaner Strasse 142, Rostock 18057, Germany. jan.wieding@med.uni-rostock.de.
Volker WeissmannInstitute for Polymer Technology, Alter Holzhafen 19, Wismar 23966, Germany. weissmann@ipt-wismar.de.
Juliane PasoldUniversity Medicine Rostock, Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Laboratory, Doberaner Strasse 142, Rostock 18057, Germany. juliane.pasold@med.uni-rostock.de.
Anika Jonitz-HeinckeUniversity Medicine Rostock, Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Laboratory, Doberaner Strasse 142, Rostock 18057, Germany. anika.jonitz@med.uni-rostock.de.
Rainer BaderUniversity Medicine Rostock, Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Laboratory, Doberaner Strasse 142, Rostock 18057, Germany. rainer.bader@med.uni-rostock.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the treatment of osseous defects micro-structured three-dimensional materials for bone replacement serve as leading structure for cell migration, proliferation and bone formation. The scaffold design and culture conditions are crucial for the limited diffusion distance of nutrients and oxygen. In static culture, decreased cell activity and irregular distribution occur within the scaffold. Dynamic conditions entail physical stimulation and constant medium perfusion imitating physiological nutrient supply and metabolite disposal. Therefore, we investigated the influence of different scaffold configurations and cultivation methods on human osteoblasts. Cells were seeded on three-dimensional porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds manufactured with selective laser melting (SLM) or electron beam melting (EBM) varying in porosity, pore size and basic structure (cubic, diagonal, pyramidal) and cultured under static and dynamic conditions. Cell viability, migration and matrix production were examined via mitochondrial activity assay, fluorescence staining and ELISA. All scaffolds showed an increasing cell activity and matrix production under static conditions over time. Expectations about the dynamic culture were only partially fulfilled, since it enabled proliferation alike the static one and enhanced cell migration. Overall, the SLM manufactured scaffold with the highest porosity, small pore size and pyramidal basic structure proved to be the most suitable structure for cell proliferation and migration.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbioreactordynamic culturehuman osteoblastsmicrostructurescaffoldstatic cultureTi-6Al-4V

Identifiers

PMID28793519
PMCPMC5455497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.