ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Investigation of the Melting Behavior of DNA Three-Way Junctions in the Closed and Open States.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased Flexibility between Stems of Intramolecular Three-Way Junctions by the Insertion of Bulges.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Effect of dC → d(mBiochimie · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramolecular three-way junctions are commonly found in both DNA and RNA. These structures are functionally relevant in ribozymes, riboswitches, rRNA, and during replication. In this work, we present a thermodynamic description of the unfolding of DNA intramolecular three-way junctions. We used a combination of spectroscopic and calorimetric techniques to investigate the folding/unfolding thermodynamics of two three-way junctions with a closed (Closed-J) or open (Open-J) junction and their appropriate control stem-loop motifs (GAAATT-Hp, CTATC-Hp, and Dumbbell). The overall results show that both junctions are stable over a wide range of salt concentrations. However, Open-J is more stable due to a higher enthalpy contribution from the formation of a higher number of basepair stacks whereas Closed-J has a defined structure and retains the basepair stacking of all three stems. The comparison of the experimental results of Closed-J and Open-J with those of their component stem-loop motifs allowed us to be more specific about their cooperative unfolding. For instance, Closed-J sacrifices thermal stability of the Dumbbell structure to maintain an overall folded state. At higher salt concentration, the simultaneous unfolding of the above domains is lost, resulting in the unfolding of the three separate stems. In contrast, the junction of Open-J in low salt retains the thermal and enthalpic stability of the Dumbbell structure although sacrificing stability of the CTATC stem. The relative stability of Dumbbell is the primary reason for the higher ΔG°
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.