Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28792955›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A robotic system for researching social integration in honeybees.

Karlo Griparić, Tomislav Haus, Damjan Miklić, Marsela Polić, Stjepan Bogdan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Design and preliminary application of outdoor flying pigeon-robot].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Integrating Robots Suggest Mitigation Strategies for Ecosystem Decay.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  8. The Logic of Interactive Biorobotics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karlo GriparićUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav HausUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
Damjan MiklićUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marsela PolićUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
Stjepan BogdanUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel robotic system developed for researching collective social mechanisms in a biohybrid society of robots and honeybees. The potential for distributed coordination, as observed in nature in many different animal species, has caused an increased interest in collective behaviour research in recent years because of its applicability to a broad spectrum of technical systems requiring robust multi-agent control. One of the main problems is understanding the mechanisms driving the emergence of collective behaviour of social animals. With the aim of deepening the knowledge in this field, we have designed a multi-robot system capable of interacting with honeybees within an experimental arena. The final product, stationary autonomous robot units, designed by specificaly considering the physical, sensorimotor and behavioral characteristics of the honeybees (lat. Apis mallifera), are equipped with sensing, actuating, computation, and communication capabilities that enable the measurement of relevant environmental states, such as honeybee presence, and adequate response to the measurements by generating heat, vibration and airflow. The coordination among robots in the developed system is established using distributed controllers. The cooperation between the two different types of collective systems is realized by means of a consensus algorithm, enabling the honeybees and the robots to achieve a common objective. Presented results, obtained within ASSISIbf project, show successful cooperation indicating its potential for future applications.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationBehavior, AnimalCooperative BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsAlgorithmsAnimalsBeesEquipment DesignRobotics

Identifiers

PMID28792955
PMCPMC5549902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.