Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28792620›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2017

Cut-Point Levels of Phosphatidylethanol to Identify Alcohol Misuse in a Mixed Cohort Including Critically Ill Patients.

Majid Afshar, Ellen L Burnham, Cara Joyce, Brendan J Clark, Meagan Yong, Jeannette Gaydos, Richard S Cooper, Gordon S Smith, Elizabeth J Kovacs, Erin M Lowery

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Majid AfsharStritch School of Medicine , Burn and Shock Trauma Research Institute, Loyola University Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois.
Ellen L BurnhamDepartment of Medicine , Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Cara JoyceDepartment of Public Health Sciences , Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois.
Brendan J ClarkDepartment of Medicine , Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Meagan YongStritch School of Medicine , Burn and Shock Trauma Research Institute, Loyola University Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois.
Jeannette GaydosDepartment of Medicine , Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Richard S CooperDepartment of Public Health Sciences , Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois.
Gordon S SmithShock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research (STAR) - Organized Research Center , Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth J KovacsDepartment of Surgery , University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Erin M LoweryStritch School of Medicine , Burn and Shock Trauma Research Institute, Loyola University Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois.
Loyola University Chicago · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Supplement: CoPARC: Colorado Pulmonary Alcohol Research CollaborativeR24AA019661 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ELLEN L BURNHAM · 2011 to 2026
$8.5M
Hangovers and Traffic Injuries: Is Alcohol's Influence Greater Than Expected?R01AA018313 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SMITH, GORDON STEPHEN · 2010 to 2014
$2.7M
Ethanol Effects on Recovery after InjuryR01GM115257 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KOVACS, ELIZABETH J. · 2015 to 2018
$1.7M
CHANGE OF GRANTEE INSTITUTION 1 K23 AA024503 Alcohol, Burn-Injury, and Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeK23AA024503 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AFSHAR, MAJID · 2016 to 2020
$948k
Alcohol and Lung Transplantation: Understanding donor and recipient consequencesK23AA022126 · NIAAA · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI LOWERY, ERIN · 2014 to 2018
$905k
Tailored Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Medical IntK23AA021814 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CLARK, BRENDAN JAMES · 2014 to 2017
$688k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA021814NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA022126NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA024503NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018313NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA019661NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough alcohol misuse is associated with deleterious outcomes in critically ill patients, its detection by either self-report or examination of biomarkers is difficult to obtain consistently. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a direct alcohol biomarker that can characterize alcohol consumption patterns; however, its diagnostic accuracy in identifying misuse in critically ill patients is unknown.

methodsPEth values were obtained in a mixed cohort comprising 122 individuals from medical and burn intensive care units (n = 33), alcohol detoxification unit (n = 51), and healthy volunteers (n = 38). Any alcohol misuse and severe misuse were referenced by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and AUDIT-C scores separately. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed, and the discrimination of PEth was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

resultsThe area under the ROC curve for PEth was 0.927 (95% CI: 0.877, 0.977) for any misuse and 0.906 (95% CI: 0.850, 0.962) for severe misuse defined by AUDIT. By AUDIT-C, the area under the ROC curves was 0.948 (95% CI: 0.910, 0.956) for any misuse and 0.913 (95% CI: 0.856, 0.971) for severe misuse. The PEth cut-points of ≥250 and ≥400 ng/ml provided optimal discrimination for any misuse and severe misuse, respectively. The positive predictive value for ≥250 ng/ml was 88.7% (95% CI: 77.5, 95.0), and the negative predictive value was 86.7% (95% CI: 74.9, 93.7). PEth ≥ 400 ng/ml achieved similar values, and similar results were shown for AUDIT-C. In a subgroup analysis of critically ill patients only, test characteristics were similar to the mixed cohort.

conclusionsPEth is a strong predictor and has good discrimination for any and severe alcohol misuse in a mixed cohort that includes critically ill patients. Cut-points at 250 ng/ml for any, and 400 ng/ml for severe, are favorable. External validation will be required to establish these cut-points in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholismBiomarkersCohort StudiesCritical IllnessDried Blood Spot TestingFemaleGlycerophospholipidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersGlycerophospholipidsphosphatidylethanolAlcohol MisuseBiomarkerCritical IllnessPhosphatidylethanol

Identifiers

PMID28792620
PMCPMC5626634
OpenAlexW2742675928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.